<p>I will gladly have MJG 88 on there for the Legend/Steelers TT I run. Then Ill wait forever when theyre cheaper to get the real one since I have Adams lol</p>quickfire said:After the fiasco that we had last Comp Pass, McCutcheon, it seems that EA is listening, even if a little bit.
https://twitter.com/easports_mut/status/1579484207973531649?s=46&t=TSFn9Q6p-Io-oAcN2hNaawAccording to EA: 'The Level 11 Competitive Field Pass Reward (88 OVR BND AKA Player - Choice of 1) includes both Mean Joe Greene & Edgerrin James. The 88 OVR BND item is eligible to go into sets.'
This is a HUGE change that is positive for everyone trying to build these AKA Champions. In case you weren't aware, when you complete one of the 91 Sets for AKA Champions, you get back the 88 BND for that specific player back to use to power-up the Champion. This means that you only need 5 other 88 AKA players instead of 6 now; which as of right now, if you aren't quick with sniping represents a 200k+ savings.
HUGE HUGE, HUGE
Re: [Comp Pass] Level 11 Rewards - 88 OVR BND - HUGE NEWS
Re: [Comp Pass] Level 11 Rewards - 88 OVR BND - HUGE NEWS
<p>Agree very much. NAT would be a huge step up for all cards versus NCAT.</p>Daddy said:Wouldn’t that make it not a BND?
So shitty that we are excited about cards returning to NAT level.. lol and don’t get me wrong this is good news
Re: Would any LB be a good user with Lurker?
<p>Yeah havent seen anything else updated since for it so that would be the only thing we have. </p> <p>So between DB at Sub and then them not having high BSH could result in harder to get through. </p> <p>CB: NTL and Fields are the only above 70. <br /> SS: Atwater…</p>StrikeFromAbove said:Thank you so much. Good to know it's true now!
Re: Would any LB be a good user with Lurker?
<p><a href="https://www.mut.gg/news/closed-beta-feedback-madden-nfl-23/">https://www.mut.gg/news/closed-beta-feedback-madden-nfl-23/</a> </p> <p><strong>lay Awareness</strong> - <em>Too easy to run the same plays over and over again</em></p> <ul> <li><strong>DEV NOTE:</strong> We’ve made a number of changes since the Closed Beta to bring more balance to gameplay. We believe these ch…</li></ul>StrikeFromAbove said:I hear you. That makes a lot of sense. It sure seems like they struggle no matter the rating.
I appreciate it. Would love to see that information if you're able to find it.
Re: Anyone Else Not Have Solo Battles?
<p>They need to be flooded through tickets and tweets. This is horrible.</p>ewestcoat said:I’m either dumb or bored (probably both) but I submitted a ticket through EA.
If you think this game is bad try going through EA support 😂
Re: Anyone Else Not Have Solo Battles?
<p>Ive said this since the beginning of the year but so many people said I was wrong lol. </p> <p>Thankfully as a hardwired, I dont usually notice too much lag.</p>hidesertace said:In the past when i have been cut off on solo battles early on Sundays they have become available again in the afternoon on Mondays. So I was expecting them not to work first thing today. They might be available this afternoon for those of us who are locked out.
I have come to the conclusion that EA does not want "offline" play and is trying to drive everyone to h2h online. However, their servers suck--I have three different high speed connections in my house and none of them are the problem; nothing else ever disconnects but EA frequently can not provide a stable connection particulary during peak hours in north america. Last week on a hard wired fiber connection the lag was so bad that i just quit out and haven't really played again since. Add in the desync/freeze glitchers and online h2h can be very frustrating.
Pretty clear to me that they only want MUT ppl playing online so they can manipulate them into buying points for packs.
Re: Which QB Release(s) Have You Liked The Most So Far?
Re: Taysom Hill better get TOTW
<p>TE usually but he'll play QB if they need him to. </p> <p>Last year his OOP card could play both.</p>QB283 said:I don't even know what position Taysom Hill plays anymore
Re: Should we sell our teams
<p>I would say if you have BND backups you can play and can get over 500k or more then its worth it. If not then meh.</p>Cjohnson said:vast majority of my team is bnd so it only be a few people
Re: Comp reward M. Hooker
Original post moderated<p>I think he is pretty solid and worth it (if you play online at least). <a href="https://www.mut.gg/players/?market=2&abilities=4351-x-x">https://www.mut.gg/players/?market=2&abilities=4351-x-x</a> </p> <p>only 9 people get edge prot. <br /> The 3 high ends are all over 650k+ and 2 of them are limited. <br /> Armstead was free but …</p>
Re: best RE on current gen under 200k?
<p>I just edited it like 5x lol (found someone thats a sleeper). Depends on if you want a pure RE for whatever reason vs how much you want to spend. </p> <p><a href="https://www.mut.gg/players/?market=2&abilities=4344-x-x&positions=12">Bruce Smith</a> cheapest, pure RE that gets Edge Threat (300k vs 550+). But now that you can stack anyone…</p>Stakeew said:Thank you for the help, I can get bruce smith if thats the best option?
Re: best RE on current gen under 200k?
Re: Should we sell our teams
Re: Would any LB be a good user with Lurker?
<p>Sadness. Thanks for trying at least.</p>Martyr1968 said:87 speed and low agility and COD offset that height. I'm a lover of Stork cards as user cards but not this one.
Had my most insane user INT ever with a Hendricks card I think 2 or 3 yrs ago. He went horizontal from like 10 yards away and laid out to pick one. My opponent even paused and messaged me in disbelief. I told him I was just as amazed myself. But that's not this card. Stork wi get an end game user card but this isn't it.
Re: Would any LB be a good user with Lurker?
<p>I dont have exact info, but I know somewhere I either read or saw, that they made a nerf to SS as sub and how they get to the ball; so if its run play, its better to have actual lbs. </p> <p>If I can dig through and find it Ill try but maybe Im even jus…</p>StrikeFromAbove said:I've noticed I struggle a lot to get off blocks with Keanu Neal even in solos (to be fair, it's low at 66) but I know sometimes safeties can't get off blocks while blitzing. Curious if this is always the case no matter their traits and ratings?