<p>I didn't say it was right or good. Please read what I wrote. I'm simply saying that you should consider using something other than "bait and switch". That's simply not accurate. You were never promised anything to be switched out from...</p>DaMadLaberWaLabsAt12 said:A simple search of my history here would tell you I'm not new lol. I've played every MUT since it's inception and am in the top 1% of players to ever do it. Yes I know things like this have happened before many times, that doesn't make it right.
Re: April 22nd 2025 A Day That Will Live In Infamy
Re: April 22nd 2025 A Day That Will Live In Infamy
<p>The OP mentioned suing. And I'm not defending them. But you clearly don't understand the definition of bait and switch. People are absolutely allowed to not like what happened. But EA never promised anything, and never switched anything. For those t…</p>mherzog617 said:I never once said they should be sued so calm your self over there; but again math is math bud and you lock a card at a sell value that was equal to 25-1. So yes in a way Ea 100% did a bait and switch and to defend them is a joke. Cards couldn’t sell because to many of them so alot of people quick sold and they then lowered the conversion rate. Same as LTDs you can’t list for under 350k correct and thats what it quick sells for so why would it not be the same for this at its lowest listing
Re: April 22nd 2025 A Day That Will Live In Infamy
Re: April 22nd 2025 A Day That Will Live In Infamy
<p>Perhaps. Perhaps not. Perhaps they just wanted to screw over MUTLeaks. We have no idea. I'm not saying I like it. I'm not saying it makes sense. But bait and switch it's not.</p>mherzog617 said:The lowest price you could list a card said that when you did the math it came out to a perfect 25-1. Other promos such as zero chill also had a 25-1 but Ea realized to many quick sold and would stop people from needing to spend money and changed it.
Re: April 22nd 2025 A Day That Will Live In Infamy
<p>You assume that they must not being doing anything. The reality is that we don't know, do we? Perhaps EA likes the leaks? Perhaps they are trying to shut it down? Perhaps they don't want to wind up on the 6:00 news for suing someone, like most big c…</p>Cizzle said:A billion dollar company is doing nothing about a dude consistently leaking info from the same account about their game?
Imagine somebody leaking info about the newest Sony products before they do it themselves. They would sue the hell outta them.
It's for people to think they have a leg up on EA. He wrote "suspected ratio 25 : 1". Either you get the info from code or somewhere or you don't. How do you suspect a ratio? He just phrased it that way to not get blamed afterwards. But he shall not worry. People will always blame EA (most of the time rightfully so) even if he messed up.
Re: April 22nd 2025 A Day That Will Live In Infamy
<p>At the floors, sure. But that doesn't mean you couldn't sell it higher than that, which many people who were on early did. You weren't locked into a 25:1 ratio if you're selling above the floor. Wild idea.</p>mherzog617 said:Lmao EA 100% price locks what are you saying. You couldn’t put the price any lower than 436K which equaled out to 25-1 and was done by EA 😂 to say they don’t price locked is wild
Re: April 22nd 2025 A Day That Will Live In Infamy
<p>That's not a bait and switch. Lol. That's you being presumptuous and assuming it would be the same. Look, I'm defending EA. But they did nothing wrong <em>in this case.</em> You can be salty. You can say you don't like it. But you can't say they cheated you …</p>mherzog617 said:The lowest price you could list a card said that when you did the math it came out to a perfect 25-1. Other promos such as zero chill also had a 25-1 but Ea realized to many quick sold and would stop people from needing to spend money and changed it.
Re: April 22nd 2025 A Day That Will Live In Infamy
<p>MUTLeaks is definitely not EA.</p>Cizzle said:You guys seriously think mutleaks is not part of EA? Of course he is. A dude giving out leaked info on their game for years and EA does nothing about it? Get outta here. You got played fellas.
Re: Having political words only from one side allowed as a team name is BS from EA
Re: April 22nd 2025 A Day That Will Live In Infamy
<p>They didn't imply anything. You inferred things. Genuinely asking, is this your first year playing? This happens every year during events like ZC and SR. This is nothing new.</p>DaMadLaberWaLabsAt12 said:Ok English professor, you got me. You are only allowed to imply so much in a court of law(civil law anyway), before it can be rightly assumed. What EA did right here would be like them saying "hey I'll sell you my car for $5000", they are driving a brand new Ford Mustang so you say "sure I'll buy it". They hand you the keys to a beat up Dodge Neon, you say "woah I thought I was buying the Ford Mustang", then EA says "nah that's my friends car, you bought my Dodge Neon, pay up". Needless to say you would have a case should they try to make you buy the Neon, as they heavily implied you were buying the Mustang.
Re: April 22nd 2025 A Day That Will Live In Infamy
<p>You said you were "bait and switched". You weren't at all. And yes, you could sell cards. I sold all of mine early. Were the prices great? They weren't. But did I do better than 20/25 karrots per? I did. It's all speculation when you play the AH. No…</p>DaMadLaberWaLabsAt12 said:EA never said anything implicitly regarding the conversion rate, but they price locked Sugar Rush cards at the minimum rate of 25 coins per carrot on the auction block, with no realistic way to sell them other than quickselling and waiting for conversion. It would then make sense that the conversion rate would therefore be the minimum rate they themselves set on the auction block. This has nothing to do with MUTLeaks speculation.
Re: April 22nd 2025 A Day That Will Live In Infamy
Re: 🚨 Any Non-LTD/Non-Ranked 98 or 99 OVR MUT Item Auction [Ends 4/21 at 9:00 PM EDT] 🚨
<p>This is the winning bid. Congratulations!</p>Slammer4244 said:4500