<p>W, ty for answering man</p>Amungusbeest said:It would still count
Re: Simulation GM Standings
Re: [CONFIRMED] PLAYOFF PT 2 :LTD C.J. STROUD & J. Alexander & BLURRS
<p>Should've joined the <a href="https://www.mut.gg/forums/forum/sports-discussion-14/topic/simulation-gm-m24-team-signup-27225/">MUT.GG Sim GM</a>. The guy who owns the Steelers team hasn't updated the lineup since September.</p>Saph said:Strict lions tt. I like it.
Warriors Assistant Coach Dejan Milojević Dies At 46
Re: TOTW MEGATHREAD: Every Card From This Joke Of A Program - Thank God It's Over!!
Re: Simulation GM Standings
<p>Imagine not having a 91 OVR defense, could never be me</p>Geo7030 said:you can play players oop but i think itd only count for the position they are playing in ur lineup
Re: [CONFIRMED] PLAYOFF PT 2 :LTD C.J. STROUD & J. Alexander & BLURRS
<p>Shit ur right lol</p>Geo7030 said:also just noticed this but if u put malcolm rodriguez at lolb itd keep ur lb ovr up higher too lol.
Re: Simulation GM Standings
Re: [CONFIRMED] PLAYOFF PT 2 :LTD C.J. STROUD & J. Alexander & BLURRS
<p>Keeping Gibbs at HB cause I still want to have the best OVR HBs in the Vertical Division lol. Montgomery going back to HB if he gets a LTD/Champion card.</p>Geo7030 said:also if u put vaitai at starting lg and gibbs at fb your ovr shud go up, even just putting montgomery at fb would make it go up a bit i think
Re: [CONFIRMED] PLAYOFF PT 2 :LTD C.J. STROUD & J. Alexander & BLURRS
<p>Didn't even know that putting my HB at FB was allowed lol. With the o-line I was trying to be as close to the Lions real life lineup as possible but atp idc anymore lol.</p>Geo7030 said:also if u put vaitai at starting lg and gibbs at fb your ovr shud go up, even just putting montgomery at fb would make it go up a bit i think
Re: Trash
<p>Very well said.</p> <p>I used to think that the league might tell EA that it's time to get their shit together or else the contract is off, but they only care about money as well! The Peacock exclusive playoff game is proof.</p>peatrick said:Preaching to the choir, my good man. So sad, but oh so very true. Our only hope at this point is that EA is so full of themselves that they don't think they need to renew their exclusive contract / licensing deal with the NFL.
I signed up for simulation fatball... this has been anything but. Our professional athletes need abilities on both sides of the ball (Gift Wrapped on offense, or Pick/LurkArtist on defense) just so they can catch the damn ball. EA gave up on trying to actually fix this and has basically admitted they have no idea how to program their way out of this mess of spaghetti code they've got on their hands. It's not possible to rework the entire game in a single calendar year and that's exactly what needs to be done, otherwise we'll just continue to be spoon-fed this constant stream of low-effort, recycled bullshit time and time again.
Sadly, the only solution i've found is to simply walk away -- yet here i am. Because what other simulation NFL experiences can we go enjoy? Unbelievable. So bad.
Re: Reduxes
Re: Duplicate
<p>Did you really need to call him a lazy bum?</p>Idapapi79 said:Did we really need another thread on this.
And atleast show the images lazy bum
Re: [CONFIRMED] PLAYOFF PT 2 :LTD C.J. STROUD & J. Alexander & BLURRS
<p>I mean Stroud got a 91 in the same program as Anzalone and now he's getting a 95 OVR LTD. I would honestly prefer someone else like a new Montgomery.</p>LoganWilsonDidntHold said:Thought the one on the left was Anzalone but he already has a 91 so may not be but it’s EA so anything is possibleeeeee