<p>Thx for clearing it up, I kinda thought that was it from just playing a bunch of games with both types of X factors on...</p> <p>As far as the most dominant defender in the game, there might be a new sheriff in town...That Seasons reward Sapp card is abs…</p>lachry said:Thanks martry, you as well :)
Yea, the X-Factors are confusing. The ones that just say "Super Bowl" are the same basic X-Factors that are in the game now that are all 0 AP, that come standard on almost most cards. These are the ones we've had in years past, and the ones that take a LOT to activate (for example Freight Train is 5 carries of 10+ yards). The only difference is the SB ones start on, and will stay activated for a few plays. I tried some on MGJ/Ware, and they were gone fairly quickly (I think its 30 yards given up on defense to de-activate for those), and getting them back requires 3+ sacks I believe.
The ones that say "Super Bowl X" are the newer types of X-Factors we've already gotten this year like "Pick Artist XXF" or whatever they are called. Those are X-Factors that aren't as dominant (for example pick artist), but requires a lot less to activate. Again, the "Super Bowl XXF" are the same as those, they just start on.
Re: Safety question/issue (FS/SS, User) - opinions wanted
Re: SUPER BOWL THEME TEAM?
Re: SB Past Ray Nitschke
<p>See, that's the same issue I have with my defensive setup. I'm in nickel a lot also, so I can use one of them at SubLB (probably Nitschke because of his pass rush stats) but using 2 LBs instead of safeties as a user - I just don't think LBs are as e…</p>n1eee said:thats a great set up but I’m mostly in dollar or dime 1-4
Re: SB Past Ray Nitschke
<p>Totally true, good point. Simmons just always seems to play even taller but I do remember a few years back when Nitchske was the best LB user in Madden for a while. Plus he's a beast of a pass rusher</p>n1eee said:agreed but Ray is 6’3, simmons is 6’4 not a big difference
Re: Safety question/issue (FS/SS, User) - opinions wanted
<p>First, good to hear from you and hope you and your fam are well....</p> <p>As to your above post, that's a really good point. I also wonder what the difference is between the X factors labeled as "Super Bowl X" and those just labeled "Super Bowl" ...</p> <p>Do …</p>lachry said:Lynch's 0 AP avalanche is a starting on X-Factor, that will be gone in just a few plays. It's hard to re-activate it. I wouldn't let that be your deciding factor.
You CAN get it always on, as he gets it in his last ability bucket, but it's 2 AP. I'm currently using Lynch/Ray in the box, and Rocket/Lott deep. Derwin is my nickel CB.
I still feel Derwin is the best defensive card in the game (he at least plays like he is), so he would be the one for sure. Lynch/Lott is a toss up. I think they are both very similar cards.
Safety question/issue (FS/SS, User) - opinions wanted
Re: SB Past Ray Nitschke
What's the difference between SB X and plain SB factor
Re: Whoa, ranked is TERRIBLE. Lol
<p>Honestly, there will be cards to rival Simmons pretty soon. Right now I user 96 OVR Derwin and he's a great user. Sometimes I user 94 Pola Mao...even 94 McKinney is a very good user. I stay away from usering LB's...Safeties just seem to be better us…</p>qwandadon said:Ranked came at the right time, right after ZC ended. I got to hero quickly (four days) and stopped. Simmons is going to be a monster. I would not keep playing for Washington. And for darn sure wouldn't grind for top 100. I tried last season and they moved the goal post for the legend reward.
Re: Washington or Simmons
<p>Hey JC.... does the MZKO kick in if your usering him?</p>jcsteel66 said:Simmons -- 1 AP Mid-Zone KO and 1 AP Lurk Artist. Best user in the game.
Re: 📉🔥📉 EA stock posts biggest daily (percentage) drop since 2008 🗑️🗑️🗑️
<p>I was referring to the article referenced but in any event, EA did not release their fiscal 24/25 financials yet for the last quarter . The article was referring to the anticipated upcoming financials. </p> <p>What you are referring to are the financials …</p>heheheheexd said:they do post their revenue numbers for in-game content. EA calls it "live services". they grossed about $1.3B just in ppl buying points across FC, Madden and whatever just last qtr.
Re: 📉🔥📉 EA stock posts biggest daily (percentage) drop since 2008 🗑️🗑️🗑️
<p>You'd be surprised.</p> <p>Look at the binder sync leaderboard. You'll see how many people (including myself) that are members here , account for massive coin stacks, binder value (much of which are either driven by big spenders or content creators). Ther…</p>whiplash13 said:I am down but this site wouldn't put a dent into the amount of money people spend on Madden. You would need this to go viral through several/all of the major content creators. #maddenspendstrike
Re: 📉🔥📉 EA stock posts biggest daily (percentage) drop since 2008 🗑️🗑️🗑️
<p>A) Yes I do own shares and I get their financials, 10Q, 10K reporting, etc</p> <p>B) It correlates more to Soccer and Dragon age (mostly to Soccer) but a hit this big over this long of a time period may very well actually push them to give more attention …</p>DancingMan said:why does anyone care about EA stock? Do you own any? Do you actually think that correlates to Madden? Please.
Re: 📉🔥📉 EA stock posts biggest daily (percentage) drop since 2008 🗑️🗑️🗑️
<p>This is primarily about Soccer but they talk about game sales but what they're not saying is purchases of in-game content, which is definitely a driving factor in EA's financial performance (or lack of).</p>peatrick said:Analysts parse franchise's troubles
EA won't release their full earnings until the afternoon of Tuesday, February 4th... but they are clearly underperforming. It seems they're trying to get ahead of the news by prereleasing the bad numbers. The road ahead for EA appears "bumpy" to put it gently. Everyone seems to be waiting to hear what will be on the release schedule for 2026 and 2027.
INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW. Do we think they manage to keep an exclusive NFL license, or will the league finally allow some other competitors (Take Two Interactive?) to take a stab. We spend day after day providing feedback, but they don't give a shit and quite frankly, they don't have the talent or Dev staff/skill to make any meaningful changes within the constraints of the buggy ass Frostbite game engine. This is what they think of all of us annoying ass video gamers... why won't we just shut the fuck up and give them more money? Guess we need to be a bit more loud.
>> The analysts there said that anecdotally, they’d “**heard mounting player complaints about stale content and monetization schemes.**” But they said the level of complaining wasn’t any greater than normal.
Re: Roster Revolution cards are taking a step backwards!
<p>Attention seeking. That's really the only reason people who make posts like this do that. Sadly, most people like that keep on doing the same thing. It is what it is.</p>qwandadon said:I'm glad someone else sees it. Dude is just a troll that adds nothing to every post. He offers no advice, his comments are negative, and I still dont know why he's on this site.