HOW ABT JOSH ALLEN GETTING MVP!!!

HOW ABT JOSH ALLEN GETTING MVP!!!

kallo817 said:

HOW ABT JOSH ALLEN GETTING MVP!!!

Garbage.

HATTING

Moved to sport discussion. Please post in the correct forum.

Lamar got robbed

YES SORRY

I am a Dolphin fan but thought he deserved it as much as it pains for me to say that.  If the MVP was based purely on stats Burrow would have won.  It's MVP and he is More Valuable to his team than Lamar is to his.  Would put money on that Baltimore would still be a +.500 team w/o Lamar.  Bills would be a 4-5 win team at best.  Allen puts that team on his back week in and week out.

PHILLYPHAN1436 said:

Looking at those numbers, it's clear it should have been Burrow or Barkley. Bengals may not win a single game without Burrow.

weplaythose said:

Looking at those numbers, it's clear it should have been Burrow or Barkley. Bengals may not win a single game without Burrow.

I think Saquon should have won it (totally no bias) 

He was the MOST VALUABLE PLAYER to his team

PHILLYPHAN1436 said:

I think Saquon should have won it (totally no bias) 

He was the MOST VALUABLE PLAYER to his team

I think when you break it down. I would have had Burrow first and Barkley second.

I think there is a strong argument to be made that the Bengals may be a 0-3 win team without Burrow, especially with how bad their defense is.

Barkley had easily the best RB season in recent memory, and he is no doubt insanely good, but with the O-Line and just the Eagle's roster being as stacked as it is, it's fair to wonder how many other backs could have put up similar numbers in Philadelphia. Although, you can use that logic for Burrow as well do to the receivers he has.

MVP is always gonna get some people angry because there is rarely ever a clear-cut number 1.

PHILLYPHAN1436 said:

I think Saquon should have won it (totally no bias) 

He was the MOST VALUABLE PLAYER to his team

i agree even if he did betray the giants he was why they were ever relevant