kaotikords's posts

StrikeFromAbove said:

I hear you.  That makes a lot of sense.  It sure seems like they struggle no matter the rating.

I appreciate it.  Would love to see that information if you're able to find it.

<p><a href="https://www.mut.gg/news/closed-beta-feedback-madden-nfl-23/">https://www.mut.gg/news/closed-beta-feedback-madden-nfl-23/</a> </p> <p><strong>lay Awareness</strong> - <em>Too easy to run the same plays over and over again</em></p> <ul> <li><strong>DEV NOTE:</strong> We’ve made a number of changes since the Closed Beta to bring more balance to gameplay. We believe these ch…</li></ul>

ewestcoat said:

I’m either dumb or bored (probably both) but I submitted a ticket through EA.

If you think this game is bad  try going through EA support 😂

<p>They need to be flooded through tickets and tweets. This is horrible.</p>

hidesertace said:

In the past when i have been cut off on solo battles early on Sundays they have become available again in the afternoon on Mondays.   So I was expecting them not to work first thing today. They might be available this afternoon for those of us who are locked out.  

I have come to the conclusion that EA does not want "offline" play and is trying to drive everyone to h2h online.  However, their servers suck--I  have three different high speed connections in my house and none of them are the problem; nothing else ever disconnects but EA frequently can not provide a stable connection particulary during peak hours in north america.  Last week on a hard wired fiber connection the lag was so bad that i just quit out and haven't really played again since. Add in the desync/freeze glitchers and online h2h can be very frustrating.  

Pretty clear to me that they only want  MUT ppl playing online so they can manipulate them into buying points for packs.

<p>Ive said this since the beginning of the year but so many people said I was wrong lol.  </p> <p>Thankfully as a hardwired, I dont usually notice too much lag.</p>

<p>I wish JDawg would use links for the releases. Would make it so much nicer. <br />  </p> <p>Trad 2: Plunkett I like a lot and he has fearless which I love. IF he got SFL hed be perfect freebie but I get why they didnt. <br /> Sling 2: Vick has  which has been great b…</p>

QB283 said:

I don't even know what position Taysom Hill plays anymore

<p>TE usually but he'll play QB if they need him to.  </p> <p>Last year his OOP card could play both.</p>

Cjohnson said:

vast majority of my team is bnd so it only be a few people

<p>I would say if you have BND backups you can play and can get over 500k or more then its worth it. If not then meh.</p>

Original post moderated

<p>I think he is pretty solid and worth it (if you play online at least). <a href="https://www.mut.gg/players/?market=2&amp;abilities=4351-x-x">https://www.mut.gg/players/?market=2&amp;abilities=4351-x-x</a> </p> <p>only 9 people get edge prot. <br /> The 3 high ends are all over 650k+ and 2 of them are limited. <br /> Armstead was free but …</p>

Stakeew said:

Thank you for the help, I can get bruce smith if thats the best option?

<p>I just edited it like 5x lol (found someone thats a sleeper). Depends on if you want a pure RE for whatever reason vs how much you want to spend. </p> <p><a href="https://www.mut.gg/players/?market=2&amp;abilities=4344-x-x&amp;positions=12">Bruce Smith</a> cheapest, pure RE that gets Edge Threat (300k vs 550+). But now that you can stack anyone…</p>

<p><a href="https://www.mut.gg/players/?market=2&amp;power_moves__gte=80&amp;finesse_moves__gte=80&amp;speed__gte=75&amp;sorts=-price&amp;positions=12">Pure RE</a></p> <p><a href="https://www.mut.gg/players/?market=2&amp;price__lte=200000&amp;power_moves__gte=80&amp;finesse_moves__gte=80&amp;speed__gte=75&amp;positions=12%2C11%2C14%2C16">Anyone that can be RE</a></p> <p>Best bet is probably  <a href="https://www.mut.gg/players/20551-rashan-gary/23-16530024/">Rashan Gary</a> . 20k less than Donald, gets Edge Threat, very similar stats.</p> <p>If you just want to stick pure RE, eh probably Donald. I wish Bruce Smith was 100k less lol.</p>

<p>I rarely sell my team. Just seems too much. And its always better to do things yesterday. I dont think itll make that much of a difference personally. Unless you have all 300k+ cards or something and can play with BND team then youre fine.</p>

Martyr1968 said:

87 speed and low agility and COD offset that height. I'm a lover of Stork cards as user cards but not this one. 

Had my most insane user INT ever with a Hendricks card I think 2 or 3 yrs ago. He went horizontal from like 10 yards away and laid out to pick one.  My opponent even paused and messaged me in disbelief.  I told him I was just as amazed myself.  But that's not this card. Stork wi get an end game user card but this isn't it.

<p>Sadness. Thanks for trying at least.</p>

StrikeFromAbove said:

I've noticed I struggle a lot to get off blocks with Keanu Neal even in solos (to be fair, it's low at 66) but I know sometimes safeties can't get off blocks while blitzing.  Curious if this is always the case no matter their traits and ratings?

<p>I dont have exact info, but I know somewhere I either read or saw, that they made a nerf to SS as sub and how they get to the ball; so if its run play, its better to have actual lbs.  </p> <p>If I can dig through and find it Ill try but maybe Im even jus…</p>

Martyr1968 said:

Cordarelle is my other SubLb next to Kam. But I'm trying out different LBs. Thomas Davis gets lurker for 1 AP also , he will have 90 speed and 94 jumping on my team.....so that might be something,  we will see

<p>Let me know  how that works.  need seems like they’ll be a great combo.</p>

<p>90+: speed, acc, agi, btk, trk, and can catch as rec back plus gets BMF. best back you can get easy.</p>