SlowAndSteady's posts

<p>I got him Monday when he dropped and all week he seemed underwhelming. Finally had more time to REALLY test him out this morning and the results were the same.</p> <p>I tried him at LE, RE, and DT, Colossus or UF. DoN or DoN-less. I couldn’t get him to do…</p>

<p>104</p>

<p>I assume you’re talking about your AP limits?</p> <p>You could have offensive players under the Specialists tab with abilities activated.</p>

<p>I don’t see how that would benefit us playing the current game.</p> <p>I assume you already know they have the database for the older games in the menu, right?</p>

Imdagoat247 said:

Thank you whoever took my faleele suggestion nd made it a reality

<p>It’s not exactly a new idea:</p> <p><a href="https://www.mut.gg/players/22104-daniel-faalele/23-47022104/">https://www.mut.gg/players/22104-daniel-faalele/23-47022104/</a></p>

<p><a href="https://www.mut.gg/forums/forum/mut-discussion-10/topic/are-the-new-uls-in-the-token-pack-55957/">https://www.mut.gg/forums/forum/mut-discussion-10/topic/are-the-new-uls-in-the-token-pack-55957/</a></p>

TBone75 said:

So what your saying is Defensive Rally stacks?

<p>Not trying to take away from <span class="js-user-profile-link-app" data-user-id="108952" data-username="peatrick"><a href="/u/id/108952/">@peatrick</a></span> here but this is the info from my testing a couple years ago:</p> <p><a href="https://www.mut.gg/forums/forum/mut-discussion-10/topic/defensive-rallypr-points-testing-14430/">https://www.mut.gg/forums/forum/mut-discussion-10/topic/defensive-rallypr-points-testing-14430/</a></p>

Woodysky said:

I agree they do feel clunky. I was actually thinking about selling Ted and getting someone else. I keep hearing the boz is good and you mentioned him. Whose the best if I was to replace him? Peppers is in basically just for chem and I have a bnd 95 of him. I moved ant to slot and Ward to outside. Think that's the better move? I have ward 95 bnd as well but willing to move off for better option.

Think getting Doug martin to boost jeanty is worth the coins or no?

<p>I think overall Edgerrin Cooper would be my #1 choice. He moves pretty smooth and has arguably the best stack for 0AP:</p> <p>Reinforcement, MZKO, Lurk Artist, Tackle Supreme, Enforcer Supreme, and Form Tackler or Extra Pop </p> <p>Ant in the slot will be bett…</p>

rboi11 said:

I won the Travis Hunter raffle on this website. I still don’t have it on my Account. Should I have gotten it by now?

<p>Probably some time middle of next week.</p>

Woodysky said:

Just pulled jeanty from the 96+ bnd pack. So I got him and what stack does Tony get? I like to run both man and zone that's why I went with wàrd. My user is Hendricks LB or peppers. Went with Hendricks cuz he's big and has 0 mid zone and man. Peppers I had 95 bnd and was trying to get the oop height bonus. But it's only up 2" not 3.

I don't use base formation very often. Mostly nickel and dime so using bonds there 

I loved Vernon maybe I'll pick him up again.

<p>That’s a nice bnd pull!</p> <p>Tony wouldn’t get the stack you want for man &amp; zone so proceed as is.</p> <p>I tried using Ted and Peppers and they were very clunky for me but if you’re doing fine with them then keep at it. Some of the other cards I mentione…</p>

Woodysky said:

https://www.mut.gg/25/lineup-builder/7dcd4a80-e811-4f04-89aa-5e64de2f79f5/ that is my team. I didn't have time to go through every ability but I am using the usual stuff that the player would be using. Although I have been using catching abilities on my wrs. Julio is deep mid and short elite. McDaniel and Andre both short and mid. I don't know what else to use instead on offense. But those abilities have made a noticable difference I feel.

<p>Team looks pretty solid overall.</p> <p>Positions I would consider upgrading:</p> <p>TE, HB, LB’s (if you use them), CB</p> <p>Cards I would suggest:</p> <p>TE Jonnu, Vernon, Judge, Taysom Hill</p> <p>HB Derrick Henry</p> <p>LB Edgerrin Cooper, Derrick Henry, Boz</p> <p>CB move Ant to slot …</p>

Woodysky said:

If I build my lineup in the builder section would you be willing to look at my team and give some advice on how I should tweak and change it? Looking for any and all constructive comments.

<p>Sure man, feel free to post it or message me with it.</p>

Woodysky said:

Yes all valid but putting price aside I don't see how combine Pat is still better. Doesn't he have the same traits as the tribute? I'm not saying he's worth 1+ million more. Not sure what he's going for at the moment but he is still better I would think. I mean how would his combine cards play differently and better? I dunno.

<p>Yeah I wasn’t really trying to argue that the Combine card is better, I said the two cards played the same for me. I was saying an argument could be made that the combine is better because of the on/off X-factors.</p> <p>Either way we need some more great…</p>

Woodysky said:

Tribute oop chem is really good I thought goes to 6'4" and he gets UC for 0 and bottleneck plus return man. I feel he is clearly better except Pat gets avalanche or reinforcement. Combine Pat was a dawg for me but I don't see how he is equal. If you run only zone than I can see that but I don't see how you can run zone still every play. Especially with Omaha now.... Your thoughts? I love hearing all sides

<p>Yes I run 99% zone.</p> <p>The height boost is cool but I haven’t had issues with the Combine height either. Plenty of times where Combine Pat has picked off tall receivers by jumping 10 feet in the air and undercutting the throw. I have had issues with s…</p>