<p>Team looks pretty solid overall.</p> <p>Positions I would consider upgrading:</p> <p>TE, HB, LB’s (if you use them), CB</p> <p>Cards I would suggest:</p> <p>TE Jonnu, Vernon, Judge, Taysom Hill</p> <p>HB Derrick Henry</p> <p>LB Edgerrin Cooper, Derrick Henry, Boz</p> <p>CB move Ant to slot …</p>Woodysky said:https://www.mut.gg/25/lineup-builder/7dcd4a80-e811-4f04-89aa-5e64de2f79f5/ that is my team. I didn't have time to go through every ability but I am using the usual stuff that the player would be using. Although I have been using catching abilities on my wrs. Julio is deep mid and short elite. McDaniel and Andre both short and mid. I don't know what else to use instead on offense. But those abilities have made a noticable difference I feel.
Re: Must have cards
Re: Must have cards
<p>Sure man, feel free to post it or message me with it.</p>Woodysky said:If I build my lineup in the builder section would you be willing to look at my team and give some advice on how I should tweak and change it? Looking for any and all constructive comments.
Re: Must have cards
<p>Yeah I wasn’t really trying to argue that the Combine card is better, I said the two cards played the same for me. I was saying an argument could be made that the combine is better because of the on/off X-factors.</p> <p>Either way we need some more great…</p>Woodysky said:Yes all valid but putting price aside I don't see how combine Pat is still better. Doesn't he have the same traits as the tribute? I'm not saying he's worth 1+ million more. Not sure what he's going for at the moment but he is still better I would think. I mean how would his combine cards play differently and better? I dunno.
Re: Must have cards
<p>Yes I run 99% zone.</p> <p>The height boost is cool but I haven’t had issues with the Combine height either. Plenty of times where Combine Pat has picked off tall receivers by jumping 10 feet in the air and undercutting the throw. I have had issues with s…</p>Woodysky said:Tribute oop chem is really good I thought goes to 6'4" and he gets UC for 0 and bottleneck plus return man. I feel he is clearly better except Pat gets avalanche or reinforcement. Combine Pat was a dawg for me but I don't see how he is equal. If you run only zone than I can see that but I don't see how you can run zone still every play. Especially with Omaha now.... Your thoughts? I love hearing all sides
Re: Must have cards
<p>The 99 Tribute Pat played the same for me as the Combine. I actually had many more noticeable big plays with the Combine card. Combine card also gets the on/off X-factors that arguably make it even better than the tribute. </p> <p>Obviously the tribute ca…</p>Woodysky said:Your saying combine Pat is as good as tribute ltd??? I guess I didn't clarify that haha.
Re: Must have cards
Re: At this point of the game, is it theme team?
Re: Draft pt3 Snails
Re: What fullbacks can go to 99 ovr
<p>It seems likely he will be the LTD.</p>Iwishiwaszirk69 said:Can’t believe I’m saying this but if it’s true I might take a fullback as my free legend
Re: aka icons
Re: AKA LTD George K Pulled
Re: Can you all view and criticize and help with lineup
Re: Which Guy does most Sacks & Pressures for you
<p>Yes</p>Ayooper said:Can you play the ted Hendricks lb and ss card on the field at the same time?