<p>I’m fine without HRM, I just don’t want to invest 3AP into Gunslinger on him. I might try it if he gets cheap enough in a week or two. I don’t run much with my QB but it could be fun for a minute.</p>LLLAAAAMMMMMAAAARRRR said:I’ve used Lamar’s aka (duh)
Hes the best running b and whit his special truzz X factor it’s crazy
but passing… you have to use fearless or he’s unusable also gs is mandatory so sadly u can’t use hrm but if your ok without it hes pretty good
Re: Mark Brunell vs. Steve Young
SlowAndSteady
Posts: 4272
Re: Mark Brunell vs. Steve Young
SlowAndSteady
Posts: 4272
<p>Young seems to be throwing bombs deep as well. I don’t think I will be going back Let It Rip, Sprinter has been WAY too good for me.</p>stinkybananas said:Im just using brunell with let it rip because hes free and he has 99 thp and 99 DAC so he can just absolutely bomb it deep
Re: Mark Brunell vs. Steve Young
SlowAndSteady
Posts: 4272
<p>Thanks man, I appreciate the opinion. HRM isn’t a necessity for me so I think I roll with Young for a while and see how it goes.</p>Gent said:If you're not running HRM, I'd say Young is better simply because Slinger 3 is arguably just as good as Silnger 1 overall (especially Slinger 3 with Gunslinger). Slinger 1 is better short, they're about equal on medium, and Slinger 3 is better deep.
I'm using Brunell and absolutely love him, but I also really liked Young and if not for me wanting to use HRM (and also being a fan of Brunell when I was a kid), I would most likely have stayed with Young.
Re: Mark Brunell vs. Steve Young
SlowAndSteady
Posts: 4272
<p>Thanks for the input, I think I will stick with young for a while and see how it goes.</p>wkward83 said:I had young and switched to Brunell , Brunell has been better for me , but young is still pretty dang good.
Re: Mark Brunell vs. Steve Young
SlowAndSteady
Posts: 4272
<p>Thanks for that info. I’m going to stick with Young for a while then.</p>sensicough said:From what I’m hearing stick with Young or Brunell. I haven’t tried Lamar yet but hearing all kinds of horror stories about under pressure inaccuracies. Some who dropped Brunell after 24 hours for Lamar are already coming back to Brunell.
Re: How many ltds have u pulled
SlowAndSteady
Posts: 4272
<p>Tyrann Mathieu </p>
<p>Mike Williams</p>
<p>Desmond King</p>
<p>Bo Jackson</p>
<p>Cordarrelle Patterson</p>
<p>Rasul Douglas</p>
<p>Jadeveon Clowney</p>
Re: Mark Brunell vs. Steve Young
SlowAndSteady
Posts: 4272
<p>Wow thanks for the input! Young just seems way too good for his price tag right now. </p> <p>I felt like Young’s release seemed really fast with Gunslinger but I haven’t used anybody with Slinger 1 this year so I didn’t know what to compare it to. I also…</p>sensicough said:Nope Young is better. His release is actually exactly the same or slightly better (on average) as slinger 1 QBs with GS equipped. I was shocked but I proved it. His deep balls are better and slightly faster. Short throw slinger 1 has the edge. Mid is debatable but all averaged out Young is faster and his stats are amazing.
I like Brunell in H2H due to ability ap cost
…tested Elway, Young and Brunell release speeds with SFL (or PLE) and GS equipped. Young averaged .01 faster!! Didn’t expect it
Mark Brunell vs. Steve Young
SlowAndSteady
Posts: 4272
<p>I have compared the two on MUT.gg and according to the attributes Young looks better. Obviously Brunell has a much better release.</p>
<p>I picked up Young last night and have Gunslinger and PLE on him. He’s been really good so far.</p>
<p>Wondering from those …</p>
Re: Crusher/enforcer stackable?
SlowAndSteady
Posts: 4272
<p>They are two different abilities so yes you can use them both. If you’re going to user him then go for it. I actually really like Enforcer because you can hit-stick HB’s that have Tank and still get the tackle.</p>Mobsquad99 said:Thinking of running both crusher and enforcer on Prez. Is this effective or would I basically be wasting ap? I hardly ever notice it light up with crusher alone.
Re: Best Investments
SlowAndSteady
Posts: 4272
<p>I would recommend buying 88-93’s cheap in preparation for TOTY. Usually the sets require several cards to make the TOTY players so everything needed will go up significantly.</p>
<p>The sets may even require 1 94 or possibly even down to 86’s or 87’s so I…</p>
Re: Best DT for Legend TT?
SlowAndSteady
Posts: 4272
<p>John Randle has played the best for me at DT.</p>
Re: I genuinely feel scammed wtf
SlowAndSteady
Posts: 4272
<p>Soon you will be taking out another mortgage on your home and the repo man will be coming for your car.</p>
<p>Seriously don’t go to the casino, gambling ruins lives.</p>
Re: TOTW 90+ fantasy
SlowAndSteady
Posts: 4272
<p>It seems I misunderstood your other comment. No need to be a Dick.</p>bcolby20 said:I don't think reading comprehension is your strong suit. I'm saying what else would we use all these tokens for besides quite obviously a toty player.
Re: Today’s LTD’s In Training Re-Rolls?
SlowAndSteady
Posts: 4272
<p>Such a weird thing to assume.</p> <p>Because I rolled some AKA’s and noted that I didn’t pull any LTD’s, that means I went there looking for LTD’s?</p> <p>I rolled a few AKA’s hoping I would have better luck late afternoon today than I did yesterday morning. Fo…</p>bcolby20 said:The way you said "I did roll through a bunch of the AKA re-rolls and didn’t pull any LTD’s." made me think otherwise, since that's pretty obviously saying you were pulling aka's looking for LTDs lol.
Re: TOTW 90+ fantasy
SlowAndSteady
Posts: 4272
<p>Must be your first year playing MUT? </p> <p>The tokens will go in a set when TOTY comes out. The last couple years it has been a fantasy pack, choose 1 out 3 TOTY players:</p> <p> 1 Offense, 1 Defense, and 1 Special Teams.</p>bcolby20 said:Exactly. What the hell else are all these tokens for.