<p>WOW, how tf do they mess that one up so bad?</p>bcolby20 said:Predetermined by a few years apparently. The broncos card hasn't been on the team since 2020 lmao it's just a joke of a program. Nothing would have been better than this 0 effort slap in the face
Re: Team Diamonds 2 Looks Underwhelming
New Controller Today (YAY ME)
Re: Team Diamonds 2 Looks Underwhelming
<p>Lol, you’re right. I don’t see anything too shiny with these!</p>acomplixsituation said:Team Rusty Diamonds more like...
Re: LT Madden
Re: Team Diamonds 2 Looks Underwhelming
<p>For sure had to be pre-determined. Agreed Pola-Mao is a big W with all team chems.</p>ThorsQuads said:Think these were obviously pre-determined but getting a free 99 makes the whole promo a W. i run a Packers TT and we got an XFL player lmaooo so that’s reason enough to complain but the 99 Polo-mao makes up for it by 10
Re: Team Diamonds 2 Looks Underwhelming
<p>Preach man!</p> <p>Outside of Pola-Mao there’s nothing noticeably special about this promo. Even X2 team chems isn’t really that enticing at this point.</p>GGerz said:picking a tone of linemen is weird… picking current players for TD2 is weird… not making these card special ability wise was weird.
just a rough week for the MUT team. It’s basically april, let loose and have fun.
Re: Team Diamonds 2 Looks Underwhelming
<p>I would have liked some Legends not already in game as well!</p>kaotikords said:The free 99 user god is sweet till GT at least.
Other than that with a bunch of no names and players not on their own teams anymore is very sad.
Wish we could have brought back some legends we havent seen in awhile.
Re: Team Diamonds 2 Looks Underwhelming
<p>I agree Chubb was overdue for an upgrade.</p>QB283 said:Glad Chubb got one, and also glad we get a free 99. Other than that, completely agreed
Team Diamonds 2 Looks Underwhelming
Re: what level are yall currently
Re: 3-4 defensive playbook or 46 base?
Re: How Much Training Do You Have Saved For Eggs?
Re: Top SS (up top, not in the box)
<p>These are the same that I would suggest. </p> <p>Hitman I like better in the box though.</p>kaotikords said:Derwin, Neal, Hitman, R. Harrison
But I think well get one this weekend for Legend.
Re: UL positional chemistry
<p>Grimm and Pouncey actually did alright for me. I had more trouble with my tackles. I’m used to having Abe Lucas at RT and he gets out front on stretch runs. When I switched to Willie he’s too slow and I think his Lead Blocking is too low for me on t…</p>hidesertace said:yes i agree as the UL program comes along the 99's that are released will be the very best cards and that chem will make them even better.
even with the chem UL Grimm was noticeably worse than Tornado imo.
Re: UL positional chemistry
<p>I had a similar experience. I put together the UL o-line and it underperformed the o-line I was using before. I also have Tornado as backup. I think maybe it might be more worth it when we get better UL o-linemen.</p>hidesertace said:i didn't notice enough of a positive effect to justify the 2 mil+ price tag for the UL Oline. Sold them off.
Went back to Trent Williams LT backed up by Terror, Tornado at LG and backup center, TOTY Kelce back at center, comp pass Nate Davis at LG, and kept UL Willie Andrerson at RT.