<p>I am running a 50/50 Steelers tt lol Who said I didn't</p>Terryfying said:If you love the Steelers enough to bitch about these cards then why aren't you running a 50/50? I've been 50/50 Washington since September.
Re: EA doesn’t like the Steelers
Re: EA doesn’t like the Steelers
<p>Totally agree with you..</p>Steelcurtain4life said:I love the look of the new d.wash but only problem is same as the Pickens it takes alot I mean alot to get to level 48 I haven't done it yet I mean with solo battles being down for periods of time and the simple fact of just time alone you have to max out both solo battles stats and mut champs stats every week maybe for people that can play more then 1 to 2 hours a day that's easy but for a dad with a full time job more then an hour or 2 a day on the weekdays is too much it needs to be easyer or then need to make more of them auctionable so I don't have to pay 1mil for a card nobody else wants but steelers fans, it just seems like even when EA is giving the steelers cards they fund a way to f#$k us like a 88 mason cole when we already had a 90 pouncey it's just like wtf EA it feels on purpose by them like they are all browns fans and they are getting back at the steelers thru this game.
Re: EA doesn’t like the Steelers
<p>Eagles sucks and Steeler Nation RISE!!!!</p>Kyleb63 said:You seem like a really unhappy dude. I’m out…enjoy being miserable running a Steelers TT.
Fly Eagles Fly.
Re: EA doesn’t like the Steelers
<p>You making like that is easy to do. You got to grind for that lmao.........</p>Geo7030 said:your getting ur second free card from comp pass this year lol not much to complain about
Re: [SNICKERS PROGRAM STATS & PICS] Deebo Samuel,T.J.Watt,Jaylen Waddle
<p>TJ Watt is the leader in sacks 87 overall with 83 speed this is an abomination to say the very least. His core elite is an 86.</p>Slammer4244 said:Per GMM update incoming today
**To get these you pick 1 of the 3 players then simply play the solo challenges to upgrade them to an 87 ovr.You do NOT get all 3 players.**
Re: EA doesn’t like the Steelers
<p>Vick that I can’t fully power up until after Christmas okay that’s great thank you sir</p>Kyleb63 said:Like I said Porter will almost certainly get faster when you get a top end Porter Jr next week.
Spillane had 1 pick in 52 games before this year. He has done a good job being in the right place but he isn’t some sort of coverage wizard.
If you want to bring Spillane (a Raider) into this then feel free to mention you are getting a free 93 OVR Mike Vick with wild abilities…
Re: EA doesn’t like the Steelers
Re: EA doesn’t like the Steelers
<p>How about Joey Porter Senior 84 speed for a 92 overall card? Or Spillane 69 zone and 68 man coverage the guy has 4-5 picks for a linebacker.</p>Kyleb63 said:Assume Porter gets faster when paired with the likely awesome Porter Jr card you will get next week.
Washington is MASSIVE. He doesn’t need top end speed to Moss guys to death. Also, I know MUT is a cartoon mode but the guy ran a 4.64 40. he should be less than 90 speed.
The real evidence you provided is TJ Watt, arguably the best defensive player in football. They screw him year after year.
Re: EA doesn’t like the Steelers
<p>JPJ SENIOR! Wake up and learn your NFL history son.</p>AZCARDS said:Is Darnell Washington getting a 92? For no reason cuz he hasn’t been good at all, as for jpj I haven’t seen anything about him getting a 92? Also if this were true what the hell you complaining about? 2 92’s is crazy especially one who’s like 6’7 or something, 91 speed is op. TJ watt does deserve better but he’ll get it soon, probably Christmas he always gets one then. This is just some dumb promo
Edit: just saw the Darnell Washington, bro that’s cards crazy good, he actually doesn’t even deserve 91 speed lol he’s not fast at all
Re: EA doesn’t like the Steelers
<p>How about Porter Sr, Watt, and Spillane getting hosed!</p>AZCARDS said:91 speed for a gigantic meta TE!!! Some people just complain about everything!!! Its like they expect they’re tt to always have the best card in every position with the meta stack!
Re: EA doesn’t like the Steelers
<p>You won't get him until 4 or 5 weeks from now. His 91 speed will be consider slow because we will have 93 speed TEs 4-5 weeks from now. You would have to run a 50/50 tt.</p>irishdawg22 said:91 speed slow for a Te? 🤦🏼♂️🤣
The MUT addict crew cracks me up. Maybe we should get all 99s before Xmas, and a squad full of OOP with free abilities.
Re: [COMP PASS FRIDAY STATS,PICS & REWARDS] Darnell Washington & Jack Campbell
<p>How does Campbell have a faster speed than Washington? SMH...</p>Slammer4244 said:I will update later this week once confirmed
Re: EA doesn’t like the Steelers
<p>Couldn't they choose someone else, Alex Highsmith his highest card is an 80, an 87 7+ upgrade would have been better.</p>Eagles215 said:Tj watt isn't a real upgrade just a lame promo card, the real upgrade will come within the next 2 weeks or hell get a 94-95 Christmas promo.
EA doesn’t like the Steelers
<p>TJ Watt 83 speed are you serious and this is his first upgrade it’s a +1 from his core elite.</p>
<p>Darnell Washington 92 overall with 91 speed. I have Pitts at 90 overall with 90 speed. His card will be slow when you get him 5 weeks from now.</p>
<p>Joey Port…</p>
Re: So now daily objectives dont work either?!?
<p>EA makes billions why not use that to make the game and the consumer base satisfied. instead we are becoming game testers instead of a consumer.</p>googanaba said:It’s a simple answer why the game breaks consistently:
The game was coded years ago. With each new release, they are customizing edits to that original code. After many edits, the new custom code causes something that was written in the past to break. With each new custom edit, the likelihood of other things breaking continues. This will continue until they start from scratch one day.
Same thing happened when my Fortune 500 tech company implemented SAP years ago. Instead of installing the off the shelf version of the software, we customized the crap out of it. After years of modifications we could no longer just implement a vendor required software update due to all the customization we had done over the years. It became a project each time and things would routinely break.