<p>Ok</p>Martyr1968 said:Yeah, I don't actually care, really, either way. Was responding based on my assumption of intent. If I was wrong, who gives a flying _______?
Not sure how calling someone an RPO glitcher when u have 3 total posts here and have zero knowledge of the person you're talking to is a "joke", but hey, whatever man.
One thing I am sure of though, you like stirring the pot. Do you know what that saying means? I'm sure you do, but if not look it up. It's subtle, but you like to stir up stuff. Meh, whatever. It's an internet forum. If someone gets a rise from trying to agitate a person in a forum then who am I to say that's pathetic and sad. I'm just an "RPO glitcher", according to John Madden over there, right:?
Re: New one- had a guy rage quit from a 5 yard out LMAO
Re: Aggressive Catches
Re: New one- had a guy rage quit from a 5 yard out LMAO
<p>Or quite possibly his comment was satirical, and the “bro ☠️ “ response was simply acknowledging the joke.</p>Martyr1968 said:I mean, right? WTF. Do some people really have nothing better to do than post something hateful with zero reason. Did I write anywhere that I was running the RPO glitch all game and then switched it to an out? Nope. I was going to run that play to get 4 quick yards on the slant or if he played cover 23 I was going to run for it. It was out of the wing pair formation so it loads up TEs at the end of the right side of the line. My opponent was in man in a 3-4 and had that side of the line covered so I figured the slant would work.
Then he brought his user over to the spot where the slant would be, maybe he though he could user blitz from there, as it's opposite the stacked side of the O line.....anyway, his user was right in the path of the slant and his CB was playing off coverage. If you have football IQ and really just want to pick up the first, if he's giving me 7-8 yards and I need 4, I'm gonna run either a curl or an out. he was shaded inside so the out was the right call.
What that has to do with an RPO glitch? I don't know . but that dude with 3 total posts apparently , like Rain Main or something, correlated that to what I did LMAO. I dunno, maybe the dude is like Cube Gooding Jr from that movie Radio or something
Re: [NEW TOTW PLAYERS] ALL 92s (including 2 LTD's)- HEIGHT INCLUDED
Re: [NEW TOTW PLAYERS] ALL 92s (including 2 LTD's)- HEIGHT INCLUDED
Re: NFL Overreaction Monday Week 7
<p>Slight tear in hamstring</p>QB283 said:Also why wasn't Russell Wilson playing? I didn't see any news stories about him being injured.
Re: NFL Overreaction Monday Week 7
Re: why is ed reed's 90 so much more than emmitt smith's?
<p>Lol true</p>bobbyhill316 said:And by the end of the year im sure there will be like 13 ed reed’s lol
Re: why is ed reed's 90 so much more than emmitt smith's?
Re: DeAngelo Hall...keep or sell?
Re: Please help me
Re: Cost of team diamonds sets?
Re: So, I'm the IDIOT that accidentally sold Elway for 889K
<p>Lmao I heard that!</p>TheJay1979 said:I DO NOT WANT TO! lol
Effing grind man.
Re: Site has had really slow load times this week (mobile at least)
Re: So, I'm the IDIOT that accidentally sold Elway for 889K
<p>nice to hear you are laughing it off</p> <p>i prob would quit video games forever haha. & at least like you said you still have a nice team. Some people would be crippled by a loss by that. You can prob make another Elway if you wanted to. 💪</p>TheJay1979 said:Lol I just need other people to help feel my pain. It sucks, but there are people out there with real problems.