<p>Looks like I'm not correcting you on anything although the phrases you use to caveat the statement about MUT having a <em>"big problem"</em> could be misread but lets not get bogged down with semantics.</p> <p>What I should also say is that DDA or DA or whatever y…</p>Mythomaniac said:Not really what?
I said "If that's the case" and "I honestly hope that EA is not fixing these games".
What are you exactly correcting me on?
Match Fixing involves manipulation of outcome - DDA is manipulation of outcome.
What would be the point of grinding or paying for packs if DDA will penalize the better team?
You can have your opinion, but don't speak for everyone. If you feel that "DDA is actually more fun" - Good for you.
But the rest of us might feel entirely different and we're also free to have that opinion.
Re: only losing to 86 ovr teams
EightyOne
Posts: 527
Re: only losing to 86 ovr teams
EightyOne
Posts: 527
<p>EA are on record saying its not in the game. But that refers to the patent they hold for DDA. If you read the denial, it's quite specific; suspiciously so, some might say. It's not proof of anything.</p> <p>So go and play a solo battle. Play it on Rookie,…</p>RobStillRules1 said:Could've spent the time googling dda in ea games lulz, but avoid showing any actual proof in h2h. Clearly state they don't use it in h2h in fifa, madden and NHL, to avoid giving an unfair advantage. But the more you win the more likely you are to play better players where it's going to come down to scheme vs scheme. Face reality that the game is a patch fest since forever. Unless they take a year off and start fresh it's going to be a patchwork game based off the previous year for the foreseeable future. It's an animation based rpg game with the addition of abilities. You don't have to like it, but that's what it is. Oh and sick avi, Tim browns one of my all time favorite players
Re: only losing to 86 ovr teams
EightyOne
Posts: 527
<p>Post it then.</p>RobStillRules1 said:Has been hundreds of times over the last 5 years, pretty easy to find, yet no one has proof of it in game, color me shocked
Re: only losing to 86 ovr teams
EightyOne
Posts: 527
<p>Not really. Who's to say that competitive games aren't running on code with DDA set to 0? </p> <p>And its not"fixing". A game that takes into account the skill of the player and balances it accordingly should make it more engaging. Players don't want to l…</p>Mythomaniac said:If that's the case, we have a big problem in MUT H2H.
Competitive games should not be influenced in any way.
I honestly hope that EA is not fixing these games, that would be a huge blow to the brand and their competitive integrity.
Re: only losing to 86 ovr teams
EightyOne
Posts: 527
<p>And when someone posts proof of this instead of just, you know, saying it, I'll believe it. Until then....</p>RobStillRules1 said:Yes it has, and still waiting for proof it's in the game besides saying I lost to a lesser overall team. It's always been scheme over team, overall can only cover minor deficiencies in scheme
Re: only losing to 86 ovr teams
EightyOne
Posts: 527
<p>This. I play NMS and a TT. Which means I'm always 2 or 3OVR behind a big chunk of MUT players. I'm not a really good player but I do play a fair bit of H2H and am in an online CFM and would consider myself decent. I also know how to play football as…</p>Mythomaniac said:Guys who know how to play don't need a stacked team.
I'm not saying you didn't get robbed but 99% of my picks, I knew they were picks as soon as I threw the ball.
Alot of players think that having a stacked team is a guaranteed win, but I say otherwise.
That's just my experience taking.
Re: only losing to 86 ovr teams
EightyOne
Posts: 527
<p>No it hasn't. Go and get your 'proof' and post it then.</p> <p>DDA is in the game. Of course it is. And lets not forget that the difference between 90SPD and 87SPD is negligible anyway. Definitely so when you start adding in other numbers like ACC, PRC an…</p>RobStillRules1 said:Disagree, it's been proven to not have been used in h2h
Re: only losing to 86 ovr teams
EightyOne
Posts: 527
<p>There are 3 possible reasons.</p>
<p>He's better than you.</p>
<p>DDA.</p>
<p>A combination of the first 2.</p>
Re: We gotta do something
EightyOne
Posts: 527
<p>There's one way to make EA care - DONT SPEND MONEY.</p>
<p>Either don't buy the game at all or don't buy packs. That's it. EA care very little about the quality of the game and they most definitely don't care one bit whether you like playing it. If 50 mil…</p>
Re: Why is this community so toxic ?
EightyOne
Posts: 527
<p>How would the other guy know? What would you think if you were playing someone and they 'deliberately' jumped offside to get kicked?</p>CobraMetalViper said:But,, why did my OP get angry? He got the win. What's the big deal? I should be able to clean my controller whenever I want!
Re: Why is this community so toxic ?
EightyOne
Posts: 527
<p>Couple of things. Clean your controller after the game and turn messaging off. Toxicity solved.</p>
Re: "It's Time" Epic Challenges
EightyOne
Posts: 527
<p>I did the first lot. The rewards were terrible. I won't bother going back.</p>
Re: Think I just might make it.
EightyOne
Posts: 527
<p>Level 40. I knew before it even started that I'd never finish it so have just played what I played and I'll finish where I finish. The rewards outside of Season Tickets are mostly dogshit anyway.</p>
Re: I have a problem with BND cards
EightyOne
Posts: 527
<p>At least let me QS a BND card so I don't have a binder full of crap like last year.</p>
Re: Why is this community ok with cheating and exploits?
EightyOne
Posts: 527
<p>Personally, I've never had too much of an issue with whatever the latest exploit might be. 90% of the time there are fairly easy ways to beat it. The only exception I can think of is the RPO nonsense from last year. Yes, you can adapt to stop it but…</p>