Martyr1968's posts

Re: Best Quarterback In The Game? (Weekly Positional Poll Season 2 - #7)

Posts: 4249
Gertler27 said:

Anyone who put hurts hasnt used him. Russ has been really good for me. 97 speed on my tt with Super Bowl strat. runs around like he has escape artist from last year Havnt gotten sacked outside the pocket yet

<p>Too many passes into the back of my O line's head with Russ</p>

Re: [GRIDIRON GUADIANS 2] Who are you hoping for this week?

Posts: 4249
<p>Mark Bavaro</p>

Re: Which Cards get 2x chem?

Posts: 4249
<p>I believe campus heroes like Byars</p>

Re: How to bluff threat detector?

Posts: 4249
mubby33 said:

Are alot of people running threat detector?

<p>Every comp pro seems to run it</p>

Re: TERRON ARMSTEAD BOOSTS WIDE RECIEVERS AND TIGHT ENDS

Posts: 4249
TheChamp22 said:

Gronk now the best linemen in the game with these boosts

<p>Maybe but don't forget  BIG Dog too LOL originally wrote Mad Dog</p>

LMAO some funny things heard by the KC beat reporter after the Super Bowl

Posts: 4249
<blockquote> <p><em>The 1985 Bears would like an apology</em></p> <p><em>If the NFL banned pushing runners from behind for first downs, the Chiefs would have won 38-3</em></p> <p><em>In the second half, the Eagles D was still in shock about Rihanna's pregnancy</em></p> <p><em>I wonder where Miles S…</em></p></blockquote>

Re: Do you press the "turbo" button immediately?

Posts: 4249
<p>On some runs I don't even press turbo at all. Don't need it if there's a hole. Last night I ran in from 15 and didn;t squeeze turbo at all on the run.</p>

Re: Super bowl MVP

Posts: 4249
<p>If the Eagles got just 1 stop in the 2nd half the refs wouldn't have been a factor. On a QB with a bad ankle. Can't blame the refs for how the teams played though</p>

Re: CONGRATS TO THE KANSAS CITY CHIEFS

Posts: 4249
stinkybananas said:

he had both feet in bounds when he re-established. His left toe was still dragging if you pause it at the right time

<p>It's impossible to tell that his toe was down but since the call on the field was a catch they didn;t have enough evidence to overturn it. If the call was incomplete it would have stood also</p>

Re: CONGRATS TO THE KANSAS CITY CHIEFS

Posts: 4249
stinkybananas said:

to be fair, the goedert thing was very clearly a catch. It was a good call. I'm not an eagles or a kc fan but the refs weren't as bad as people say they were

<p>By rule it wasn't. He did what they call " double-catching" the ball. If you lose possession, which he did when he bobbled it, you need to re-establish it with both feet in bounds</p>

Re: CONGRATS TO THE KANSAS CITY CHIEFS

Posts: 4249
PlasmaBeam5229 said:

The call was the difference between a gw field goal and eagles 2 minutes drill down 3, I think it very much impacted the game

<p>Yeah but there were other calls and other failures by the Eagles that led to their situation. if you've played at any significant level you know and accept that one call is never responsible for the outcome of a game.  Even the Eagles accepted that.…</p>

Re: Way to stay classy Philly Fans

Posts: 4249
Geo7030 said:

but sanders ball was not a catch. sure he had 2 feet down but he went literally nowhere before getting blown up. and what im sayin abt goederts catch is if they gon say goedert caught it then how did devonta smith not catch his? very similar plays. only difference is goedert stayed on his feet

<p>You answered your own question. By rule neither Devonta's or Goeddert's plays were catches. The refs blew it on the Goeddert call. He double caught the ball.By the time he re-established possession he only had 1 foot in bounds.</p>

Re: Way to stay classy Philly Fans

Posts: 4249
stinkybananas said:

It definitely was holding but im just sad that a great game had to come down to a call that in my opinion they should have let go.

<p>It wouldn't have been that close if Butker didn't tank that 1st half field goal anyway</p>

Re: Way to stay classy Philly Fans

Posts: 4249
Geo7030 said:

but sanders ball was not a catch. sure he had 2 feet down but he went literally nowhere before getting blown up. and what im sayin abt goederts catch is if they gon say goedert caught it then how did devonta smith not catch his? very similar plays. only difference is goedert stayed on his feet

<p>By the same rule used for Goeddert that was the very definition of a catch. He established possession with 2 feet in bounds. If you say he had to take another step post possession then Goeddert's catch would have been ruled incomplete because his ne…</p>

Re: Way to stay classy Philly Fans

Posts: 4249
Daddy said:

You don’t get to decide what is riot worthy or not

<p>Seriously, that's your takeaway. If that's all you got , it's really not worth wasting any more time responding to anything you write.</p>