<p>For me the one guy that never leaves my lineup is LT, being a Giants fan...I love Lott cards too</p>von11 said:Lol...yep I did the same thing. I changed my whole scheme around to accommodate one card, but Paul is worth it. Now once Lott drops...Paul will end up in the box as my user (Lott is my second favorite of all time), but there is always gonna be a home for Paul on my team.
Re: Legends drop disappointing
Martyr1968
Posts: 4249
Re: Legends drop disappointing
Martyr1968
Posts: 4249
<p>I hear you. I built him on Saturday. Krause cards are great. I actually switched my scheme a little to play zone on the back end and in cover 1 hole or something like that I made sure Krause was in zone.</p>von11 said:Paul Krause is my favorite player of all time...I agree those man numbers are horrible...but...still gonna be a home for my man on my squad (but..wow that man coverage number is bad).
Re: Legends drop disappointing
Martyr1968
Posts: 4249
<p>Yes they did the same thing with the LT position, releasing 3 iof them back to.back to back. Before that they did it with HBs</p> <p>But the thing that gets me the most is when they purposely make a card that would normality be great and give it a massive…</p>antitwisted said:The overlap between the cards released thus far is ridiculous. Sean Taylor and Krause are practically the same cards. They also release LBs upon LBs but do very little about DT if they're not LTDs, as an example. Oversaturating some positions and neglecting others, and in the case of Krause it's even with the exact same archetype as the last big release we had at FS.
Re: Where are you playing Troy?
Martyr1968
Posts: 4249
<p>He's best up top because of the 90 zone and 90 man. His height isn't a problem. The animations for tall receivers this year arw pretty much the same whether the DB is 5'10 or 6'1</p>
<p>PS , if you play a.man scheme at all, I'd go different than Kam and …</p>
Re: Legends drop disappointing
Martyr1968
Posts: 4249
<p>In cover 1 you have to make sure he's the safety in zone though. And. If you want to man blitz that also makes it tough. </p> <p>Turns out I can't even really use Sean Taylor because of 55 man cvg.</p> <p>I mean,.Woodson gets FS as secondary position and both h…</p>sungodxapollo said:I run cover 1 and cover 3 for the most part so he will be fine in my scheme
Legends drop disappointing
Martyr1968
Posts: 4249
<p>I have lived Krause cards in years past but this year they did him like they did Sean T. For anyone who sometimes mans up their safeties incertain situations this card becomes somewhat unusable, kinda like the ST card. 66 Man? </p>
<p>And we've no use …</p>
Re: Is Decastro much of an upgrade over Mankins?
Martyr1968
Posts: 4249
<p>I mean.I pulled him luckily, but there's no sense holding onto him unless I run a Steelers TT which I don't. Unless he's a significant upgrade over Mankins, which he isn't.</p>Yanks8981 said:I don't think all linemen play the same, but I agree it appears to be a waste unless you can get Decastro for 400.
Re: Is Decastro much of an upgrade over Mankins?
Martyr1968
Posts: 4249
<p>Because I don't need the coins and I run a lot of plays behind the RG position ,. It's probably my most utilized O Lineman .</p> <p>But I also like mobility so there's not much reason to hold onto DeCastro.</p> <p>Just wanted to get some other thoughts on it, …</p>BeeWinz said:My question to you is why would you hold on to a 700k offensive lineman when he’s only 1 overall higher, especially when all lineman play basically the same?
Is Decastro much of an upgrade over Mankins?
Martyr1968
Posts: 4249
<p>Maybe some of the blocking attributes are a little better but Mankins is his as good a lead blocker and is faster and better accel, agility, etc. </p>
<p>I pulled Decastro but thinking maybe I should just sell him and.keep Mankins there?</p>
Re: Best way to have 90 Man cvg at safety and CB positons
Martyr1968
Posts: 4249
<p>I believe Woodson gets FS as secondary chem. Pat Pete is used also I think but he's s bit slower </p> <p>Thanks</p>Breakluna said:I know playing CBs at Safety is pretty popular for this reason as they typically have better man coverage ratings. So if you're looking to man up your safeties sub some CBs in.
Best way to have 90 Man cvg at safety and CB positons
Martyr1968
Posts: 4249
<p>I've been a man cvg played primarily in Madden for at least the last 10 yrs. </p>
<p>They did Sean T dirty wit 55 Man this yr but I like having the CH chem to get +1 Speed.</p>
<p>If I'm usering Simmons, have Troy at deep SS, what suggestions do you have to g…</p>
Re: MUT.GG LTD Meta T-Shirt Auction [Ends 9/22 at 9:00 PM EDT]
Martyr1968
Posts: 4249
<p>XL is the biggest size though? Need at least 2XLTall :( If it comes in a size that would fit Gronk that's basically my size.</p>
<p>Would bid if you have that size.....</p>
Re: WRs - Pickens, Hyatt, Tyreek, Megatron, Finneran???
Martyr1968
Posts: 4249
<p>Why? Win or lose your still a jerk on the forums.</p> <p>A. Few old timers here know me from back in the day. I uaed to play his like Eric Wright ( Problem) and a lot of top 10 guys. In my competitive days I won my share of games against them. </p> <p>I've g…</p>Daddy said:Wanna play?
Re: WRs - Pickens, Hyatt, Tyreek, Megatron, Finneran???
Martyr1968
Posts: 4249
<p>Thanks man, hate to give up that speed but I tend to agree</p>TheChamp22 said:I like Pickens and Megatron on the outside and Hyatt in the slot. Hill is too one dimensional imo unless you’re running a tt to get him to 91 speed.
Re: WRs - Pickens, Hyatt, Tyreek, Megatron, Finneran???
Martyr1968
Posts: 4249
<p>Thanks Sochi. Yeah some people like to judge. I really don't care what they think. Honestly I'll sell a couple of these that I'm not going to use but I do like to run the best cards that I can</p>MrAgentSochi said:It's how he plays. He isn't the type of guy to flex or be an ass abt it. Trust me when I tell you.