Lildrift56's posts

Re: Best RB’s in the game & why ?

Posts: 2198
OvOSzn said:

Word thanks for your input brother. Was Ant breaking any tackles with all those abilities on him? Or just not as many as Quad ?

yeah he is tall 6’4” and great receiving stats.

<p>I played a couple people with ant, and I didn't pay attention to what abilities he had, but he didn't break a tackle the whole game and was very underwhelming</p>

Re: PSA: how to get a free All-Star Athlete champion of your choice, for free!

Posts: 2198
<p>It's kinda funny how unadvertised it is in game. I only knew about it because of the people on here, but I would hate to miss it because I just didn't know.</p>

Re: Best RB’s in the game & why ?

Posts: 2198
XxmatavelixX said:

Someone please list this card !

<p>That card is horrible now. I never had problems against Allen, but this is by far the worst as anything other than a backup, he gets no 0 abilities and the abilities he gets arnt even the best.</p>

Re: Best all star athlete cards

Posts: 2198
<p>Randall McDaniel we is a dog and cheap RN because how expensive the others are. Any of the first release players that look interesting are at there cheapest now</p>

Re: Quad

Posts: 2198
<p>henry is the best RB in the game end of discussion. I played ant and he didn't seem special but king Henry is on a different level</p>

Re: Where are you using your Def AP - Pass Rush or coverage

Posts: 2198
<p>I'm running seiler on ravens  vikes TT barno Daniele and hargrave they get constant pressure, rest of Ap is used randomly on abilities for coverage</p>

Re: What was your promo this year

Posts: 2198
<p>Bare minimum ln everything and edelnut95 out of one of my free 95+</p>

Re: Who is everyone taking and why

Posts: 2198
<p>Henry, I have ravens 20 chem and he looks insane. Plus when I upgrade I can just run Henry on D with dual threat and avalanch for 2</p>

Re: Who is rb1??

Posts: 2198
<p>Henry ant quad sweat</p>

Re: can you add your BND player into the 95?

Posts: 2198
<p>I'm sure could, was planning on taking Randall mcdanial and running him at wide out until I got a better one, but Henry was good to pass on</p>

Re: What WR did you pay for?

Posts: 2198
SlowAndSteady said:

Tony G CB at 98 OVR gets all the same offensive attributes as his 98 OVR TE card. Only difference is he doesn’t get offensive abilities. I’ve been using him on both sides for a week now and he’s played great, runs nice routes, and gets some nice pancake blocks on run plays.

<p>Yes that makes sense. I was saying a natural corner like Christian Gonzalez. Edelman couls play offense I'm sure too. As far as natural players I think only deion could play both. OOP moss will probably be insane at WR tommorow</p>

Re: Nix Nerfed?

Posts: 2198
<p>I never was on the nix train and thought he was mid at best, but EA definitely makes cards worse to make the new ones "better" wouldn't be shocked if that was the case</p>

Re: What WR did you pay for?

Posts: 2198
EpicDude28 said:

Gonzalez CB?? As in TOTY Christian Gonzalez or Tony Gonzalez?

<p>was my same thought, would be interesting to put anyone other than sanders at WR</p>

Re: Coin Distribution

Posts: 2198
<p>ive been wiped once, but didn't lose almost any coin cause I went on a spending spree before it happened. If you think your at risk, invest in high expsense LTDs because they don't take cards</p>

Re: 1.6 MILLION training rolls/results

Posts: 2198
ItsmeD said:

Good day 

Every one I spoke to that plays MUT pretty much gets the same results , which is more mid field packs and 70+ overall packs than the other options 
I think it’s terrible to put 70+ packs when this amount of training is being asked it  shouldn’t even be included just keep the mid field as the lowest pack.

<p>Completely agree, hard enough to profit with real packs, when you throw in a gold player your just screwed. My experience is Superbowl packs are most common and worse than midfields, that being said 70s are the worst feeling to see on the screen. Yo…</p>