Will Ranked players be weak compared to Superbowl players

Loveland might be ok because 94 speed and all 32 them chems

But Peppers and Riq Woolen if they dont have X Factors will probably be weak compared to superbowl cards?

.

Therefore focusing more on stacking coin, then grinding ranked

100%

ranked players have been garbage all season.  they look great until you realize when you get them they are junk 1 week later

Woolen will be 98 speed at 6'4" with 1 AP mid zone and at a deep position of need.  No way that's not valuable for any elite team.

jimshredder said:

Loveland might be ok because 94 speed and all 32 them chems

But Peppers and Riq Woolen if they dont have X Factors will probably be weak compared to superbowl cards?

.

Therefore focusing more on stacking coin, then grinding ranked

Loveland’s COD is terrible so he’s out of the running for me. Real bummer the ranked cards have had such short or nonexistent shelf lives this year though Andre and Wyatt are doing well for me. What’s ironic is I picked those 2 up for dirt cheap when EA messed up and released them to the masses during ZC 😂. At least Wyatt. Andre may have just been cheap because the ZC options were so juiced so I stashed him until those boosts expired.

SOX806 said:

Woolen will be 98 speed at 6'4" with 1 AP mid zone and at a deep position of need.  No way that's not valuable for any elite team.

facts. can only run 3 X-Factors anyway. and if you really want them all on CB, play woolen up top. Or put an x factor on a safety or D lineman 

half the cbs who have 0APs will just be pick artist or something dumb anyway, 1AP midzone and TT is still a valuable card to have

SOX806 said:

Woolen will be 98 speed at 6'4" with 1 AP mid zone and at a deep position of need.  No way that's not valuable for any elite team.

bingo