We need a new match making system.

Here’s an idea. 

After every game you rank your opponent on a scale of 1/10 based on how enjoyable they were to play. 

If they’re a sweat then they get ranked 1/10

Don’t take your rating personally but essentially if you’re a sweat people give you one star and stick you in a category where you play the other sweats

The people that offer a more casual experience get rated higher, and play other people with a similar casual play style. 

Also add a feature where you can search for opponents similar to your ranking or change it if you do want the challenge of playing more skilled players.

You can only play who the schedule makers give you. 

Otherwise there’s no point in competing. 

Weenie Hut Jr is hiring.

BobSolpurt said:

You can only play who the schedule makers give you. 

Otherwise there’s no point in competing. 

Weenie Hut Jr is hiring.

You should apply, sounds like you need a job

TheNickSix said:

Here’s an idea. 

After every game you rank your opponent on a scale of 1/10 based on how enjoyable they were to play. 

If they’re a sweat then they get ranked 1/10

Don’t take your rating personally but essentially if you’re a sweat people give you one star and stick you in a category where you play the other sweats

The people that offer a more casual experience get rated higher, and play other people with a similar casual play style. 

Also add a feature where you can search for opponents similar to your ranking or change it if you do want the challenge of playing more skilled players.

You don't even need a rating system.

You just need an algorithm that filters players who repeatedly call the same plays, or plays out of the same formation, even when the opponent's personnel dictate that a football coach would do otherwise. Let the stretch-run-spamming, RPO-spamming, Bunch X-spamming, Mid-Blitz-spamming freaks beat each other over the heads, and for those players that can call a game claiming to represent football like it's actually a football game, they can play a version of this game that would actually be enjoyable.

There are probably a handful of other cheesy things that happen that would be hard to build an algorithm around, but this first approach would get rid of a lot of the chumps that make so many games a negative-play experience.

TheNickSix said:

Here’s an idea. 

After every game you rank your opponent on a scale of 1/10 based on how enjoyable they were to play. 

If they’re a sweat then they get ranked 1/10

Don’t take your rating personally but essentially if you’re a sweat people give you one star and stick you in a category where you play the other sweats

The people that offer a more casual experience get rated higher, and play other people with a similar casual play style. 

Also add a feature where you can search for opponents similar to your ranking or change it if you do want the challenge of playing more skilled players.

LOL

But all the sweats would give everyone else a super sweat rating

.

You would almost need a 3rd party review system

.

Or an easier thing would be to remove glitches, remove abilities, remove RNG and make it normal football

.

Theres a reason why most NBA players play NBA 2k, but most NFL players cant stand Madden

jimshredder said:

LOL

But all the sweats would give everyone else a super sweat rating

.

You would almost need a 3rd party review system

.

Or an easier thing would be to remove glitches, remove abilities, remove RNG and make it normal football

.

Theres a reason why most NBA players play NBA 2k, but most NFL players cant stand Madden

There’s gotta be more casuals than sweats though right?

TheNickSix said:

There’s gotta be more casuals than sweats though right?

Not in H2H...where you need to make it a full time job to study youtubers for all the latest glitches

.

The casuals are playing more fun games like Fallout, Destiny or more enjoyable character building games

phatalerror said:

You don't even need a rating system.

You just need an algorithm that filters players who repeatedly call the same plays, or plays out of the same formation, even when the opponent's personnel dictate that a football coach would do otherwise. Let the stretch-run-spamming, RPO-spamming, Bunch X-spamming, Mid-Blitz-spamming freaks beat each other over the heads, and for those players that can call a game claiming to represent football like it's actually a football game, they can play a version of this game that would actually be enjoyable.

There are probably a handful of other cheesy things that happen that would be hard to build an algorithm around, but this first approach would get rid of a lot of the chumps that make so many games a negative-play experience.

Exactly! So we just give all those people a 1/10 rating and they get stuck playing each other. They get to be sweaty, we get to play real football, everyone wins.

jimshredder said:

Not in H2H...where you need to make it a full time job to study youtubers for all the latest glitches

.

The casuals are playing more fun games like Fallout, Destiny or more enjoyable character building games

Seasons hasn’t been that bad, ranked is a slightly different story. The H2H events seem to be the worst but also squads duos is super toxic. It does suck that people are literally making a living off finding and presenting a new glitch/exploit every week

TheNickSix said:

Seasons hasn’t been that bad, ranked is a slightly different story. The H2H events seem to be the worst but also squads duos is super toxic. It does suck that people are literally making a living off finding and presenting a new glitch/exploit every week

At least this new H2H event is normal game mode

I couldnt stand the other H2H modes with histick points, RNG players slipping on snow...then teh worst was the XFactors always on fumblerouski mode

jimshredder said:

At least this new H2H event is normal game mode

I couldnt stand the other H2H modes with histick points, RNG players slipping on snow...then teh worst was the XFactors always on fumblerouski mode

Ya I played about 10 minutes of that then just decided to buy all my snow lol

phatalerror said:

You don't even need a rating system.

You just need an algorithm that filters players who repeatedly call the same plays, or plays out of the same formation, even when the opponent's personnel dictate that a football coach would do otherwise. Let the stretch-run-spamming, RPO-spamming, Bunch X-spamming, Mid-Blitz-spamming freaks beat each other over the heads, and for those players that can call a game claiming to represent football like it's actually a football game, they can play a version of this game that would actually be enjoyable.

There are probably a handful of other cheesy things that happen that would be hard to build an algorithm around, but this first approach would get rid of a lot of the chumps that make so many games a negative-play experience.

If someone is running the same play over and over again and you can’t stop it then that’s on you. You have to adjust to be good at this game. 

Personally I love when people come out in the same play, after a few downs I will eventually lock it up. The hardest thing to defend is someone running the same formation but they run like 5-6 different route combos out of it. 

It blows my mind that you think it’s cheese or scum to call a specific play. Lmao seriously how old are you? I’m curious

lol so people would just give people they can’t beat a 1/10… this is a skill issue, not a matchmaking issue.

Lol in this idea of yours a 1.1 rating would be amazing