MUT.GG logo
Players
Reveals
Prices
Lineup Builder
Theme Teams
Forums
Binder

Madden 26 Database
  • Players
  • Reveals
  • Playbook Database
  • Programs
  • Compare Players
  • Upgrade Players
GG Points
  • My GG Points
  • Predictor
  • Raffles
  • Auctions
MUT.GG Resources
  • Binder
  • Binder Leaderboard
  • Stats Leaderboard
  • Theme Teams
  • Lineup Builder
  • Chemistry
  • Best MUT Players
  • Abilities Tier List
  • Free Ability Players
  • Weekly Spotlight Token Players New
  • Prices Dashboard
  • Price Tracker
  • Forums
  • News
Mini Games
  • MCS Bracket Challenge
  • Griddy
  • Pack Blitz
Helpful Links
  • Madden Tips
  • MUT Term Definitions
  • Strategy Items Updated
  • Platinum Quicksell Values
  • Training Quicksell Values
Older Games
  • Madden 25 Players
  • Madden 24 Players
  • Madden 23 Players
  • Madden 22 Players
  • Madden 21 Players
MUT.GG Pro
  • Subscribe
College Football 25
  • CFB.FAN

  1. MUT.GG
  2. Forums
  3. Madden NFL 26
  4. MUT Discussion
  5. Toxic H2H

Toxic H2H

Last Post
akurro33
  • Profile
  • Message
Posts: 50 |
60
#31
blckovr said:

You seem to not understand absolutely anything about DDA, EA and legal matters.

I will summarize it for you : 

1. EA owns a patent for DDA, that they spent time and money on

2. EA is NOT obliged to tell you anything about technologies they use in their games since we don't have ANY legal video game regulations

3. The lawsuit that you are talking about was not about DDA , it was about pay to win mechanics in terms of getting cards from packs and it wasn't dropped, plaintiffs got paid off to piss off

4. They use false advertising every single year without suffering any type of consequences (read point nr. 2)

5. They are a lazy company that releases the same game every single year so it's pretty obvious that if they developed a new technology, it's being used

6. There is PLENTY of evidence confirming DDA's existence gathered throughout last decade, including certain professional players saying it is in the game (from all of the EA online games)

There is probably couple other points that I could have used but you get the point. It's incredibly ignorant of you to avoid critical and logical thinking, believing everything that this toxic corporation is saying, without actually checking the facts.

I would suggest to use your brain sometimes, because you truly look like a bot right now, considering the fact that there is at least a bunch of the EXACT SAME posts from different accounts every single day. (literally using the same manner of writing and using the exact same arguments and phrases)

I presented you with the facts. You are choosing to ignore them. EA explicitly denies DDA was ever in the game and will never be. Currently posted on their website.

If you believe this so hard go get that EZ lawsuit money bro. They are dangling it right there for you.

Until then I'll wait for the evidence it is in fact in the game, because as yet all I've seen is a document showing EA has a patent for it. As if that's proof it's in the game, the only thing that's proof of is that they've looked into the idea and come up with a framework for it. Not that they have implemented in the game, and in fact, they explicitly say they haven't. So again, if you want to go ahead and sue them since you're so adamant it is in the game and there's proof (somewhere? I guess?) then go get that EZ money.

But sure, I'm the ignorant one because I'm ignoring "PLENTY" of proof that everyone has conveniently failed to produce.

Last edited by akurro33 - , edited 1 time in total.
Reply with quote Send DM Report
akurro33
  • Profile
  • Message
Posts: 50 |
60
#32
blitzfist said:

LOL

You know nothing about me.  I use critical thinking at my job daily.  You are doing exactly what you are accusing me of.  You also have presented zero facts.  If an official patent isn't proof I don't know what is.

I've presented you with the website where EA says explicitly that it is NOT in the game and never will be. You seem to be ignoring that, right? Never even acknowledged that but continue to prattle on.

Are you suggesting that's a lie? If so, isn't that a slam dunk lawsuit? Go get your money from EA, man.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
blckovr
  • Profile
  • Message
Posts: 21 |
55
#33
akurro33 said:

I presented you with the facts. You are choosing to ignore them. EA explicitly denies DDA was ever in the game and will never be. Currently posted on their website.

If you believe this so hard go get that EZ lawsuit money bro. They are dangling it right there for you.

Until then I'll wait for the evidence it is in fact in the game, because as yet all I've seen is a document showing EA has a patent for it. As if that's proof it's in the game, the only thing that's proof of is that they've looked into the idea and come up with a framework for it. Not that they have implemented in the game, and in fact, they explicitly say they haven't. So again, if you want to go ahead and sue them since you're so adamant it is in the game and there's proof (somewhere? I guess?) then go get that EZ money.

But sure, I'm the ignorant one because I'm ignoring "PLENTY" of proof that everyone has conveniently failed to produce.

You need some reading comprehension classes lil buddy.

I mentioned it TWICE, you legally can't do anything about it because it's LEGAL for them to use it and lie about it.

Now go back to being a good bot and write the same shit in a different thread.

And stop blaming other people for your inability to fact check. It's been on this forum numerous times already.

Last edited by blckovr - , edited 1 time in total.
Reply with quote Send DM Report
Legend
OVR
69
Moderator
  • Profile
  • Message
Posts: 3563 |
46K
#34

And we're done here.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Log in to join the conversation
Prev
1 2 3
© 2025 Stormstrike Inc. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Business Inquiries | FUT.GG | FIFAIndex | College Football 26 - CFB.FAN