So I’ve noticed for certain x-factors that require Tackle For Losses that sacks do not count as a TFL. By defintion a sak qualifies for a TFL except when the loss of yardage is 0 yards or the play results in a fumble. Surely this is an oversight by EA? What would be the best way to inform them? Tweeting at them? Very frustrating.
BaronVonBirdman
Posts: 293 |
950
Rollhumps
Posts: 1221 |
735
bcolby20
Posts: 760 |
648
BaronVonBirdman said:So I’ve noticed for certain x-factors that require Tackle For Losses that sacks do not count as a TFL. By defintion a sak qualifies for a TFL except when the loss of yardage is 0 yards or the play results in a fumble. Surely this is an oversight by EA? What would be the best way to inform them? Tweeting at them? Very frustrating.
Except a sack has NEVER counted for a TFL in the NFL.
BaronVonBirdman
Posts: 293 |
950
Rollhumps said:
Wow. I just assumed since Pro Football Reference, every major gambling outlet, and every major daily fantasy counting them as TFLs meant the general consensus was that when a person gets tackled for a loss of yards it is in fact a tackle for a loss. NFL doesn’t seem like a “love to use logic” type a dudes tho.
Rollhumps
Posts: 1221 |
735
BaronVonBirdman said:Wow. I just assumed since Pro Football Reference, every major gambling outlet, and every major daily fantasy counting them as TFLs meant the general consensus was that when a person gets tackled for a loss of yards it is in fact a tackle for a loss. NFL doesn’t seem like a “love to use logic” type a dudes tho.
Unfortunately, the only one that matters is the NFL.
the gambling sites doesn’t follow the same set of rules.
Log in to join the conversation