...if the slips didn't happen at the worst time, and you're trying to win [X] games in a row.
Who in the world came up with this idea of a Competitive Mode that isn't truly Competitive? The mode that rewards dice rolls?
phatalerror said:...if the slips didn't happen at the worst time, and you're trying to win [X] games in a row.
Who in the world came up with this idea of a Competitive Mode that isn't truly Competitive? The mode that rewards dice rolls?
I won 4 times in 2 days. My record was something like 46 and 6. Definitley not a luck based game mode. Get good as the kids say.
swatthatdot said:I won 4 times in 2 days. My record was something like 46 and 6. Definitley not a luck based game mode. Get good as the kids say.
Lmaoooo
swatthatdot said:I won 4 times in 2 days. My record was something like 46 and 6. Definitley not a luck based game mode. Get good as the kids say.
So the RNG doesn't get you. How'd you get so skilled rolling the dice?
phatalerror said:...if the slips didn't happen at the worst time, and you're trying to win [X] games in a row.
Who in the world came up with this idea of a Competitive Mode that isn't truly Competitive? The mode that rewards dice rolls?
for real... just go back to making us grind out 50 wins for a mid tier card we cant sell
TheNickSix said:for real... just go back to making us grind out 50 wins for a mid tier card we cant sell
You still got an item, right? Who cares if it's BND? If it's good, people wouldn't dump it for coins. But instead we have this machine that rewards the cheaters and the big, big spenders, and leaves the casuals with literally not a single gratifying mode.
TheNickSix said:for real... just go back to making us grind out 50 wins for a mid tier card we cant sell
And most importantly, that system ensured that the ogres did their deed and moved back to the coin-making modes. In a day or two, the mode was playable for more users, and by the end of the week, the mode was actually engaging.
phatalerror said:You still got an item, right? Who cares if it's BND? If it's good, people wouldn't dump it for coins. But instead we have this machine that rewards the cheaters and the big, big spenders, and leaves the casuals with literally not a single gratifying mode.
for once i was actually agreeing with you lol sorry, reading it back it sounds snarkier than i intended
phatalerror said:And most importantly, that system ensured that the ogres did their deed and moved back to the coin-making modes. In a day or two, the mode was playable for more users, and by the end of the week, the mode was actually engaging.
you are correct
theres already enough random BS that happens in this game. we dont need random slipping added in.
NickyRozay said:Lmaoooo
Whats so funny? what's funny is hearing people bitch about game modes when all it comes down to is them not being very good.
swatthatdot said:I won 4 times in 2 days. My record was something like 46 and 6. Definitley not a luck based game mode. Get good as the kids say.
no ones saying its impossible , just dumb to have something that you need games in a row be so rng based. Pracitcally as bad as all the arcade bs they do.
niggatoven said:no ones saying its impossible , just dumb to have something that you need games in a row be so rng based. Pracitcally as bad as all the arcade bs they do.
its not rng based its skilled based which makes the people who suck and usually get bailed out by rng think that the game mode sucks. I'm on another 9 and 0 run at this very moment, i've won over 50 now and lost 6. Statistics say that is not luck.
swatthatdot said:its not rng based its skilled based which makes the people who suck and usually get bailed out by rng think that the game mode sucks. I'm on another 9 and 0 run at this very moment, i've won over 50 now and lost 6. Statistics say that is not luck.
WHAT IS SKILL-BASED ABOUT HAVING GUYS RANDOMLY SLIP WHEN YOU HAND THEM THE BALL?
Man, of all the nonsense that can provoke irritation on the whole of the Internet, your response had to be the most illogical thing I've read in months. You just used the word "skill" in the context of a specific outcome that is very obviously randomly determined. You just don't read what people write.
There's dudes here I don't get along with, but you make yourself hatable with such flippant arrogance. Who cares about your record? Some rando is winning the lottery somewhere. That's not skill. Even if you were winning before the snow, and even if you are still winning months from now, you don't know what other people are rolling. So when someone gets pissed because dudes are slipping and sliding everywhere instead of making forward progress toward the sticks and not getting hit-sticked, ask yourself first: "Is the issue legitimate in principle?" Because your win-loss record isn't what makes the world around you what it is. You're really not that important, and your experience in life isn't the reference point for every other living thing.
In other words, if you can't think about a topic you're responding to before actually hitting "Reply", just save everyone else the trouble and go get yourself another blanking win. That's obviously what makes your world go 'round.
phatalerror said:WHAT IS SKILL-BASED ABOUT HAVING GUYS RANDOMLY SLIP WHEN YOU HAND THEM THE BALL?
Man, of all the nonsense that can provoke irritation on the whole of the Internet, your response had to be the most illogical thing I've read in months. You just used the word "skill" in the context of a specific outcome that is very obviously randomly determined. You just don't read what people write.
There's dudes here I don't get along with, but you make yourself hatable with such flippant arrogance. Who cares about your record? Some rando is winning the lottery somewhere. That's not skill. Even if you were winning before the snow, and even if you are still winning months from now, you don't know what other people are rolling. So when someone gets pissed because dudes are slipping and sliding everywhere instead of making forward progress toward the sticks and not getting hit-sticked, ask yourself first: "Is the issue legitimate in principle?" Because your win-loss record isn't what makes the world around you what it is. You're really not that important, and your experience in life isn't the reference point for every other living thing.
In other words, if you can't think about a topic you're responding to before actually hitting "Reply", just save everyone else the trouble and go get yourself another blanking win. That's obviously what makes your world go 'round.
i didn't read that wall but with my win rate statistics say that it is skill based and not luck based. I mean yeah occasionally a guy will randomly slip (i have had it happen less than 10 times) but that's just an excuse and has nothing to do with people losing more than they win. That just means they suck. no nice way to put it.
Log in to join the conversation