London as FS or CB

Last Post
Posts: 255 |
691
#1

Since he has Ironman and we have so many good corners. Would he be better as a 6’3 FS?

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 20 |
495
#2

His man coverage seems way too low to work at CB

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 255 |
691
#3
bigpapamurph said:

His man coverage seems way too low to work at CB

If you run a lot of man sure. I was thinking a FS user would be better with that height

Reply with quote Send DM Report
OVR
94
Posts: 82 |
445
#4
KevHager said:

Since he has Ironman and we have so many good corners. Would he be better as a 6’3 FS?

That's where I'm gonna run him, as well as my gadget/Solo side WR. (On All-Madden difficulty he meets all RR thresholds, so he should be a beast.)

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 304 |
835
#5

I have him at FS for now (with 4ap deep ko), but I don’t think he will last as a starter for long tbh.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 2351 |
4,444
#6

Neither, Dime 1-4 sub linebacker 👀

Reply with quote Send DM Report
OVR
95
Posts: 28 |
1,100
#7

i got him at safety to replace bates whos been getting torched by some faster wrs

Reply with quote Send DM Report
OVR
95
Posts: 555 |
655
#8

I run him at safety with deep zone ko and pick artist

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Log in to join the conversation