How is this Not a Thing EA?

Posts: 1124 |

2,430

Every card should automatically go into any new card they get as an upgrade and any chems the first card had show up on the new card.

Easy Examples - Crystals, Team Builders.

Posts: 1044 |

682

You would think they’d want it thy way. Make people chase the new cards.. I have no desire to buy the newest latest greatest Barkley, Surtain, or Parsons for the rest of the year without it..

Posts: 3601 |

1,255

So bring back power ups?

Posts: 1064 |

4,259

I just think it’s funny I can use 2 Ted Hendricks on defense and 2 Mike Vick’s on offense but they won’t allow me to use 2 saquon Barkleys. Just make it so we can use 2 of the same player or make a power up path for crystal cards.

Posts: 24 |

droblunts313 said:

I just think it’s funny I can use 2 Ted Hendricks on defense and 2 Mike Vick’s on offense but they won’t allow me to use 2 saquon Barkleys. Just make it so we can use 2 of the same player or make a power up path for crystal cards.

you should try to run side by side kittles

Posts: 591 |

700

Eagles215 said:

So bring back power ups?

They already have, of course, with the Flashbacks.

Posts: 213 |

350

droblunts313 said:

I just think it’s funny I can use 2 Ted Hendricks on defense and 2 Mike Vick’s on offense but they won’t allow me to use 2 saquon Barkleys. Just make it so we can use 2 of the same player or make a power up path for crystal cards.

Power up for crystal would just drive the price of of crystal. As it would just short the market of those crystals being available. TBH the shouldn’t be allowing two of the same ball on the same side of the ball.

Posts: 1064 |

4,259

ApolloZ said:

Power up for crystal would just drive the price of of crystal. As it would just short the market of those crystals being available. TBH the shouldn’t be allowing two of the same ball on the same side of the ball.

That’s my point lol why can i have 2 Ted Hendricks but not 2 saquons in my lineup. Id rather be able to have 2 of the same person in my lineup rather than a power up because like you said everyone would want those crystal cards because they would actually be usable and all tt chem.

Now having 2 of the same exact card in your line up is crazy (they actually use to allow it in the early days of mut) but I don’t see anything wrong with having a 85 saquon and a 94 saquon in your lineup. It’s already in the game, why not just do it for the crystals.

Posts: 213 |

350

droblunts313 said:

That’s my point lol why can i have 2 Ted Hendricks but not 2 saquons in my lineup. Id rather be able to have 2 of the same person in my lineup rather than a power up because like you said everyone would want those crystal cards because they would actually be usable and all tt chem.

Now having 2 of the same exact card in your line up is crazy (they actually use to allow it in the early days of mut) but I don’t see anything wrong with having a 85 saquon and a 94 saquon in your lineup. It’s already in the game, why not just do it for the crystals.

Because the crystal give out boosts. They should just make it to where you can only have one of those players on the field at once.

Posts: 2342 |

11.8K

#10

Eagles215 said:

So bring back power ups?

Posts: 1064 |

4,259

#11

ApolloZ said:

Because the crystal give out boosts. They should just make it to where you can only have one of those players on the field at once.

Duh. I know the crystal players give a boost, that’s the whole point of this conversation. We’re trying to keep the crystal boost and still use the new cards of those players. Lmao wtf? Either let us have both in the line up or allow us to put in the newer players card into the crystal players card.

Honesty the best way around this would have been to make these 3 cards collectibles or something similar to a strategy card. Have 3 sets with 1,2 or 3 components and then insert it into your lineup to give you the boost.