Crab5 said:Okay, so you are wrong and I already addressed this in the original post. The guy was not shading his players perfectly shading his guys on every play of the game. I could see him shade his players and they would be in position to play outside routes, where he would shade them 90% of the game and they would hard-win the outside route every time, but even when they were shaded and ready to play outside routes, they would break in on slants, ins, posts, and drags.
This guy was not the caliber of player to be shading ALL his routes individually, which you do not have enough time to do anyways, yet ALL his players were super-winning virtually every route for the entirety of the game, no matter how many times I switched the routes.
You are not the expert you think you are, being top 100 just means you have more time to play. The ranking points required and the records in the top 100 are very average overall.
The fact that you are not aware of DDA and play the game this much, means that you lack a significant amount of credibility for me. Either you get a tremendous amount of DDA, especially if you feel like your players ratings always work and they always do what they are supposed to... or you are just very oblivious. It isn't even up for debate whether DDA is in the game to be honest with you. I could play five games in a row against someone with your exact line-up and skill level, stick skills, and play-callng and all five games would play differently, and the players would play differently in all five games. Just like everything else EA does, DDA is broken.
I said shading and predicting. You do know those are two different things and there’s no way for you to know the predicting… I’m bout to leave this forum way too many of you just like to argue and that’s why you’re on here ✌️