elmango30 said:I mean the second anyone has a good scheme it gets called cheese. I don’t think there’s a good scheme in the game that people *don’t* call cheese. I’m open to hearing it, but people called u trips cheese and it’s just route combos
I personally think that it's called cheese because they can't stop it. Otherwise no one would ever bring up any play lol. I mean if you're that good nothing will work continously on you or cause you to lose more than you win.
If you call cheesing to win just to compete in "Gold" Ranked LMFAO. You haven't even scratched the surface. Cute tho.
acomplixsituation said:Looked liked I stumbled upon Madden Testimony Corner by accident.
W comment haha. OP is a fresh take though, strangely... LOL!
elmango30 said:I mean the second anyone has a good scheme it gets called cheese. I don’t think there’s a good scheme in the game that people *don’t* call cheese. I’m open to hearing it, but people called u trips cheese and it’s just route combos
Wrong. "Route combos" as such are football. The problem with Madden's "route combos" is that the defense generally guards them poorly, especially those out of trips bunch. If it was just route combos in general, you wouldn't see the biggest-gaining pass plays out of a tiny fraction of the game's formations.
If you're giving up receptions on zone coverage numbers due to flood concepts, that's a route combo. If you're giving up the same seam route, the same corner route, the same flats route, etc. even though the play art clearly indicates that there is supposed to be a defender assigned to that zone, that's an exploit. If you're giving up big yards after the catch from short passes to a receiver in vacated space because you're in Cover 4 and the pass rush didn't get home, that's a route combo. If you're giving up receptions to wide-open receivers because of route picks that never get called, it's an exploit.
Stop giving credit to users for exploiting the holes in a football game where the programming logic is deficient. They're playing Madden, but they're not playing football.
phatalerror said:Wrong. "Route combos" as such are football. The problem with Madden's "route combos" is that the defense generally guards them poorly, especially those out of trips bunch. If it was just route combos in general, you wouldn't see the biggest-gaining pass plays out of a tiny fraction of the game's formations.
If you're giving up receptions on zone coverage numbers due to flood concepts, that's a route combo. If you're giving up the same seam route, the same corner route, the same flats route, etc. even though the play art clearly indicates that there is supposed to be a defender assigned to that zone, that's an exploit. If you're giving up big yards after the catch from short passes to a receiver in vacated space because you're in Cover 4 and the pass rush didn't get home, that's a route combo. If you're giving up receptions to wide-open receivers because of route picks that never get called, it's an exploit.
Stop giving credit to users for exploiting the holes in a football game where the programming logic is deficient. They're playing Madden, but they're not playing football.
if you’re not zone dropping your zones *will* get pulled by different routes. The cover 3 drop play art doesn’t show you that the yellow zone will follow a vertical route and leave a curl open. That’s a primary cause of what you’re complaining about
And route picks *happen* irl. Idk what you want them to do about mesh concepts in a video game