Who did you guys take? I want both and I can't decide.
GetFin3ss3d
Posts: 108 |
280
I went Porter.
Offense is 2 ez I can score with anyone lol.
hk7260
Posts: 146 |
1,340
Porter since there are less [non-million coin] elite CBs vs elite WRs
Thornton has lower awareness and very low stamina too which is nit picky but if you are a top 3 WR on my pass first offense, I want higher ratings there. Porter much more well rounded.
blunthunt
Posts: 5 |
0
We all need elite cb
I took the CB Wide recievers are dime a dozen but Cornerbacks with all 32 chems priceless. Already got him maxed and doing work for me with 2 picks so far
Flawdust
Posts: 10 |
75
I took Porter. With my 55/60 TT Pats he's 99 MCV. As NMS I don't have the coin for 92 Gonzalez but Moss, Butte, and Nabers do just fine.
Last edited by
Flawdust
- ,
edited 2 times in
total.
PhillyEagles208
Posts: 51 |
45
I went with Porter for the same reasons as everyone above.
RyyoLurkedEm
OVR
92
Posts: 3903 |
13.7K
still deciding, leaning towards thornton since all DBs kinda play dumb anyway
ddpats6
OVR
90
Posts: 10 |
865
next week we get the other (same as last promos)
SteelersFan19
Posts: 1107 |
164
I took Porter, just filled somewhat of a hole on my team and hes nuts, steelers chem on him is nice as well. Also rlly enjoying the budget beast duo of speedy steelers Wrs rn (roman wilson and calvin austin)
n1eee
Posts: 750 |
2,565
Porter
6’3 96 speed with full boosts
he can lock down any receiver man 2 man
having a lockdown corner IMO is more important than one fast receiver
I went with 6'5" wr based on team needs and the fact that dbs will give up plays to anyone lol. I wouldn't be surprised if gold Thornton would give the cb trouble still.
I do believe next week they'll let us get the other though so I don't know that it's a hard choice either way.
My corners are elite already. I went with the 6'5" freak WR.
I'm sure we will get both eventually, though.
khaleet38
Posts: 86 |
635
Porter. Im a defense guy first.
Log in to join the conversation