Statues Lineup

Posts: 994 |

https://www.mut.gg/lineup-builder/e8d4c758-b36e-4856-9abc-66f5487d9451/

This is every player in their respective position with the lowest Change Of Direction Rating, taking Power-Ups into account. There were a couple that surprised me, honestly.

Posts: 994 |

Obviously, I don't think anyone should have to use this specific lineup unless they have a masochistic streak and ~40k coins to kill, but just playing with 1 or 2 of these players for a bit will make you appreciate everyone who has 85+ COD.

Last edited by Volcanic163 - , edited 1 time in total.

Posts: 87 |

Regardless of COD, only the fullback, kicker, and punter even have an OVR above 70, so I'm not sure who would want any of these players in June.

I wonder what it would look like if you set a minimum OVR of 90. Or how would this team play against the players with the best COD at the same OVRs?

Posts: 994 |

NelsonAT9 said:

Regardless of COD, only the fullback, kicker, and punter even have an OVR above 70, so I'm not sure who would want any of these players in June.

I wonder what it would look like if you set a minimum OVR of 90. Or how would this team play against the players with the best COD at the same OVRs?

My guy, did you not read the comment above yours? I literally said I don't expect anyone to actually use this lineup. It's purely for informational purposes. This comment feels incredibly unnecessary.

Posts: 10298 |

5,551

NelsonAT9 said:

Regardless of COD, only the fullback, kicker, and punter even have an OVR above 70, so I'm not sure who would want any of these players in June.

I wonder what it would look like if you set a minimum OVR of 90. Or how would this team play against the players with the best COD at the same OVRs?

Agree. Silver/gold line ups besides the beginning of the year dont do anything for anyone. (Whether you put a disclaimer on them or not)

If you made it slightly useable (Id even say 94+ instead of 90) then it would be worthwhile. There arent any surprises with them all being below starter cards.

Posts: 427 |

110

Lamar Jackson lmao

Posts: 87 |

Volcanic163 said:

My guy, did you not read the comment above yours? I literally said I don't expect anyone to actually use this lineup. It's purely for informational purposes. This comment feels incredibly unnecessary.

Oh yeah, I read your comment, I'm just wondering what new information this provides. I think most people are fully aware that sub-70 OVRs are not good, and COD isn't the only reason for that: every stat is low on these cards. Take Zylstra, for example: 53 SRR, 54 MRR, 52 DRR, 63 CTH, 69 CAR... even if he had 99 COD nobody wants this card beyond a filler until they get a better option.

I was suggesting setting a minimum OVR for the lineup to highlight players that may seem good based on their OVR, but their COD makes them play worse compared to others at their position.