Perfect GTs

So far I feel like the only perfectly made GT is Drake may. Just curious if there's extra guidelines holding back these cards? IMO there's pretty simple stacks for them to be elite, but although some are made close to perfect, I feel they could be better(Fridge RE, Wilson, Washington faalale)

OFFENSE

QB, drake may seems perfect, I know you cant do Omaha so not much better choices other than maybe gambit if it does contain PLE

WR, Ed too tall, or better Johny Wilson, with baked on Vangaurd, double me, angry runs, then in customs 0 AP, mossed, RT, and tank or truzz. in the 1 AP, max secure, RAC em up, and evasive? not sure if there's better abilities than the free ones so the 1 aps don't matter to much

TE, Hendricks, pitts, and maybe Zach gentry? baked ons vanguard, angry runs, double me, 0 APs, route tech, tank, and mossed, 1 APs truzz, wrecking ball, and max secure

HB, faalale, dawand and someone else fat and tall. baked ons truzz, AR, tanks, 0 aps, FOF, wrecking ball, and double me. 1 AP vanguard for the hell of it, evasive and RT

FB, dawand jones was a great choice, but bake on, mossed, double me, vanguard, 0 aps, AR, secure, tank, 1 APs idk maybe truzz, RT, and max secure

DEFENSE

DBs, hendricks, Washington, or maybe Ed too tall or peppers. bake on avalanche, uni cov, reinforcement. 0 aps, bottleneck, tackle supreme and shutdown(it works with uni, idk how to explain but ive found better plays on stacks upon testing if you'd prefer than DZKO for high plauers) 1 APs, DZKO, MZKO, or idk dual threat for blitzers

EDGE, idk if tall or short work better so pick whoever but bake ons relentless, run stuffer, UF 0 APs, Blitz (if not allowed fearmonger), avalanche, collosus, 1 APs, tackle supreme, DON, or vanguard(this is just a random choice, but I am curious if this would counter vanguard and knock over pullers w/out it, if not than reincforcement.

Interior DL, dawand Jones, falaale, or maybe Larry cause I like how he plays baked on collosus, run stuff, and relentless, 0 aps, avalanche, fearmonger and blitz if allowed, 1 APs tackle supreme, reinforcement and idk interior threat

USER, some giant like ted, peppers, Ed too tall, or Washington, baked ons, uni cov, run stuff, avalanche, 0 APs, reinforcement, maybe collosus if you blitz a lot, than film study or MZKO. 1 aps, vanguard if that works, tackle supreme and idc what else

non user SUBLB, maybe snoop, tyreek, or some other small blitzer (I'm designing this focused as a blitzer esc player). baked on collosus, reinforcement, and avalanche, 0 APs, uni cov, run stuff, and maybe fearmonger or midzone. 1 aps tacklesupreme, blitz, or relentless

I'm not sure entirely how gts other buckets work, but I'm assuming tackle supreme is free, on non corner type players. one more thing I'd add is I'd make one of the stats 99 catching on DLman for 0 AP PA to have those DL picks. not super clear on the abilites but if you have anything please share.

Great suggestions, but the majority of people creating these cards are either children, or uhhh special.  It requires a TON of effort to understand how this game plays and all the abilities available to us.  Most folks simply lack the base level understanding -- including those at EA creating the majority of these cards.

There are countless Golden Tickets with baked on Universal Coverage who then have various Zone (or Man) KOs in the later buckets.  EA has been doing this all year, repeating buckets or adding abilities which are wholly irrelevant based on the baked on stuff.  It's quite maddening, no pun intended.

I would say I lack a understanding of abilites but I get the basics. My understanding is a zone ko is needed with uni because it lacks reaction time, is that wrong?

Lildrift56 said:

I would say I lack a understanding of abilites but I get the basics. My understanding is a zone ko is needed with uni because it lacks reaction time, is that wrong?

UC includes reactions, Reinforcement doesn’t include reactions

SlowAndSteady said:

UC includes reactions, Reinforcement doesn’t include reactions

Ah I see, is this new information? I was under the impression you had to stack them

Lildrift56 said:

Ah I see, is this new information? I was under the impression you had to stack them

Nah it’s been that way for at least 3 MUT’s now.

One Step Ahead is also part of UC but there are plenty of people that will argue all day about that one.

SlowAndSteady said:

Nah it’s been that way for at least 3 MUT’s now.

One Step Ahead is also part of UC but there are plenty of people that will argue all day about that one.

I always forget that part myself. 

But yeah you have to remember most people here are super niche and have been playing for years with at least basic understanding. 

95% (being generous) of the player base is dumb af and doesnt know a route from another. When it comes to GT's its very evident.

kaotikords said:

I always forget that part myself. 

But yeah you have to remember most people here are super niche and have been playing for years with at least basic understanding. 

95% (being generous) of the player base is dumb af and doesnt know a route from another. When it comes to GT's its very evident.

💯

I have learned to expect roughly 15%-20% of GT’s to actually be insanely good cards.

I don’t get upset about GT makers choices though. It’s a once in a lifetime chance, make the cats however you want.

Like you said 95% of the player base isn’t playing this game like their life depends on it.

SlowAndSteady said:

Nah it’s been that way for at least 3 MUT’s now.

One Step Ahead is also part of UC but there are plenty of people that will argue all day about that one.

Funny, I knew the one step ahead thing but not the reaction. I must been confused with reinforcement.