Mitchell - Start? Bench? Sell?

Posts: 236 |

855

Peterson. Moss. Edwards. Ward and Ramsey (+1 SPD, +1 MCV).

Does Quinyon Mitchell play in your base, nickel, or dime packages? Is he CB5? Or do you sell him?

Posts: 851 |

2,275

Imo sell, Sweat was the most only Draft card that entered top tier

Posts: 34 |

225

In the same boat, I dropped Edwards and Ramsey, because all CBs already have 99 SPD and 99 MCV (except for Moss) and I have Tony G for the height boost. I'm also leaning towards selling Mitchell.

Posts: 3481 |

685

Right now im running him at slot with mid/flat/pa/enforcer supreme/acrobat with moss/peterson on the outside.

Posts: 491 |

3,765

One great indicator I like to see is against WR1 deep streaks in Man. I tested him against Julio in practice mode against Tribute Pat, Moss and Ant and found that with his baked on bottleneck, even without route KOs, he was by far the most consistent in man coverage in not getting burned. Not saying that he won't ever get beat, as they all do, but he was most consistent. Give it a shot.

Posts: 236 |

855

He is more of a zone cover corner but yet he has Bottleneck baked in which requires you to press.

Does Bottleneck trump Double Me? If not I think he's a sell. If it does than he's a great answer to all the 98+ receivers who seem to be getting Double Me.

Posts: 491 |

3,765

lakeofthewoods said:

He is more of a zone cover corner but yet he has Bottleneck baked in which requires you to press.

Does Bottleneck trump Double Me? If not I think he's a sell. If it does than he's a great answer to all the 98+ receivers who seem to be getting Double Me.

Good question. FWIW in my testing, I did have all ZONE KOs on and none of the route/man KOs. To your point, I wasn’t pressing as I was controlling the O just to see how he compared as AI so doubtful that Bottleneck was even a variable. All that said, he showed to be the most consistent in not getting burned at the line in that testing (again, who knows how).