I was watching some lineup builder inspiration from other users and saw, that many people have two 98 or 99 LTs and a low rated RT for chemistry. I guess they somehow still use the 2nd LT as an RT, but since every LT has an RT chem slot, why not putting them in at RT?
I saw similar things with REs. What's behind this?
iker3085 said:I was watching some lineup builder inspiration from other users and saw, that many people have two 98 or 99 LTs and a low rated RT for chemistry. I guess they somehow still use the 2nd LT as an RT, but since every LT has an RT chem slot, why not putting them in at RT?
I saw similar things with REs. What's behind this?
I don't really understand, I've got Joe Thomas at RT, exactly as you pointed out (regarding secondary position)... assuming we want or need those team chems.
This late in the year, the value from theme teams is minimal, at best. I'm still running 40/50 49ers, 20/50 Titans, then 20+ ASA and full 15/15 ASA OOP.
I don't want to have to make tons of subs over and over, so there could be SOME people which are positioning players (especially defense) based on specific formations, difficult for me to say.
I'll be curious to hear what you figure out.
iker3085 said:I was watching some lineup builder inspiration from other users and saw, that many people have two 98 or 99 LTs and a low rated RT for chemistry. I guess they somehow still use the 2nd LT as an RT, but since every LT has an RT chem slot, why not putting them in at RT?
I saw similar things with REs. What's behind this?
Not every LT has RT as secondary...Dion Dawkins for example does not...
peatrick said:I don't really understand, I've got Joe Thomas at RT, exactly as you pointed out (regarding secondary position)... assuming we want or need those team chems.
This late in the year, the value from theme teams is minimal, at best. I'm still running 40/50 49ers, 20/50 Titans, then 20+ ASA and full 15/15 ASA OOP.
I don't want to have to make tons of subs over and over, so there could be SOME people which are positioning players (especially defense) based on specific formations, difficult for me to say.
I'll be curious to hear what you figure out.
What I mean is that people put ROH Peters and TOTY Mailata at LT1 and LT2 but at RT1 they have a low rated card for chemistry. Peters and Mailata do have RT chemistry slots. I don't understand why they wouldn't put either card on RT1.
Here are some examples:
https://www.mut.gg/binder/depth-chart/rip8524/
https://www.mut.gg/binder/depth-chart/jdrum99/
https://www.mut.gg/binder/depth-chart/francks21/
Sometimes, the RT1 slot is even blank.
iker3085 said:What I mean is that people put ROH Peters and TOTY Mailata at LT1 and LT2 but at RT1 they have a low rated card for chemistry. Peters and Mailata do have RT chemistry slots. I don't understand why they wouldn't put either card on RT1.
I think one of the reasons is that there are some players who truly don't realize that a card out of position won't always lose all their stats and abilities? YouTubers do it all the time with CB' as safeties and vice versa. The OVR on the front of the card shows lower but the card plays the same. At least the YouTubers say so and the few times I've done it the cards have indeed done just fine. I don't know. Hard to guess why people do what they do. Lol.
iker3085 said:Here are some examples:
https://www.mut.gg/binder/depth-chart/rip8524/
https://www.mut.gg/binder/depth-chart/jdrum99/
https://www.mut.gg/binder/depth-chart/francks21/Sometimes, the RT1 slot is even blank.
Bc this isn't pulling from the lineup screen in game. This is just the site pulling the player card data from an account and sorting them by position. When I look at my auto-generated lineup from this site, some of the players on my in-game roster aren't even on there (like SUBLBs or Slot CBs/WRs that do not start in my main offense or defense).
I am willing to bet each one of these has players OOP.
iker3085 said:Here are some examples:
https://www.mut.gg/binder/depth-chart/rip8524/
https://www.mut.gg/binder/depth-chart/jdrum99/
https://www.mut.gg/binder/depth-chart/francks21/Sometimes, the RT1 slot is even blank.
The binder depth charts will ONLY show each card at their natural position. They aren’t actually using two 98/99 OVR cards at LT in their lineup. One of the cards is at RT1.
JDrum99 said:Bc this isn't pulling from the lineup screen in game. This is just the site pulling the player card data from an account and sorting them by position. When I look at my auto-generated lineup from this site, some of the players on my in-game roster aren't even on there (like SUBLBs or Slot CBs/WRs that do not start in my main offense or defense).
I am willing to bet each one of these has players OOP.
Ah ok, that makes sense. I thought I was missing something, like players OOP lose some of their attributes unless you start them at their natural positions and switch them in game or something like that.
Thanks for clarifying.
