Is Reinforcement, Midzone Ko, Secure tackler the perfect setup for Sub LB

Reinforcement + either Midzone Ko or One Step ahead gives you ever KO and reaction time

Midzone KO is usually cheaper AP than One Step Ahead and is often 0AP

Secure tackler so you can tackle any freight train/angry runs RBs

.

So based on that...are Malcom Jenkins and Lance Briggs the best 2 sub nickle LBs

Both can get Reinforcement, MidzoneKO and Secure Tackler

Don't think you need reinforcement if you have Midzone KO right?

Dante88 said:

Don't think you need reinforcement if you have Midzone KO right?

I would rather have Reinforcement than a specific KO

Dante88 said:

Don't think you need reinforcement if you have Midzone KO right?

Reinforcement gives all MAN kos also - basically turns midzone Ko into Universal coverage

Plus it helps a lot in the run game

Its inside stuff, no outsiders and Out of my way

.

I personally think is the best X factor, along with Dual Threat

pretty surtain midzone in useless with reinforcement

Dante88 said:

Don't think you need reinforcement if you have Midzone KO right?

it gives better reaction time to passes if you have midzone ko, you only get the knockouts with reinforcement assuming they are close enough to make a play on the catch

The way it work last year was...

Any KO allows for better reactions in all areas (just not the KO effect)

Reinforcement is KO in all areas

So having both is pretty much universal coverage minus the OSA aspect.

jimshredder said:

Reinforcement + either Midzone Ko or One Step ahead gives you ever KO and reaction time

Midzone KO is usually cheaper AP than One Step Ahead and is often 0AP

Secure tackler so you can tackle any freight train/angry runs RBs

.

So based on that...are Malcom Jenkins and Lance Briggs the best 2 sub nickle LBs

Both can get Reinforcement, MidzoneKO and Secure Tackler

While everyone is correct in arguing that Mid-Zone KO is superfluous if you are running Reinforcement, that is true only if you always user your LB (since you are in direct control of your LB’s reaction time). If you switch off the player with Reinforcement, you will want Mid-Zone KO.

I’ve literally never run Reinforcement on my user, and now that I’m reading this thread, I wonder if I’ve been missing out on some really good animations.

phatalerror said:

While everyone is correct in arguing that Mid-Zone KO is superfluous if you are running Reinforcement, that is true only if you always user your LB (since you are in direct control of your LB’s reaction time). If you switch off the player with Reinforcement, you will want Mid-Zone KO.

I’ve literally never run Reinforcement on my user, and now that I’m reading this thread, I wonder if I’ve been missing out on some really good animations.

You're missing out on a big boost to shredding run blocks and helping to stop the run

GGerz said:

The way it work last year was...

Any KO allows for better reactions in all areas (just not the KO effect)

Reinforcement is KO in all areas

So having both is pretty much universal coverage minus the OSA aspect.

I heard reinforcement with Midzone ko also boosts man coverage reactions for some reason

So its basically Universal coverage + Run stopper

jimshredder said:

I heard reinforcement with Midzone ko also boosts man coverage reactions for some reason

So its basically Universal coverage + Run stopper

I never heard that MZKO boost man coverage.

Sort of... Reinforcement + MZKO = Run Stopper + (Universal Coverage - OSA)

Universal Coverage also has OSA.

that was the easiest way to explain it in math terms lol

GGerz said:

I never heard that MZKO boost man coverage.

Sort of... Reinforcement + MZKO = Run Stopper + (Universal Coverage - OSA)

Universal Coverage also has OSA.

that was the easiest way to explain it in math terms lol

Im not 100% sure, I was going by another post I read that said reinforcement with Mid Zone gets Man boost

I run zone like 99% of the time though, especially with all the stupid motion mountain plays this year