Barkley or smith

Im still using Barkley on my eagles tt so he bumps to a 99. But a lot of people say smith is good too. But his redux price is off the chain

Charles > Barkley > Smith, IMO.  Depending on some factors like TTs or motivator boosts.

colbyzg said:

Charles > Barkley > Smith, IMO.  Depending on some factors like TTs or motivator boosts.

I'm also using Charles. He's fantastic in the pass game, my only gripe is the lack of Tank.

peatrick said:

I'm also using Charles. He's fantastic in the pass game, my only gripe is the lack of Tank.

Truzz + FT should be outlawed. Shit is unreal. Truzz > Tank too, no?

colbyzg said:

Charles > Barkley > Smith, IMO.  Depending on some factors like TTs or motivator boosts.

Lol I just woke up your comment has me cracking up

Mph91 said:

Lol I just woke up your comment has me cracking up

Hope you slept well.

Are you laughing because you agree and we're going to be BFFs... or because you disagree and think I'm an idiot?

charles is a monster

99 speed

freight train+truzz run ball carrier on aggressive with no fcks given in the RZ

colbyzg said:

Hope you slept well.

Are you laughing because you agree and we're going to be BFFs... or because you disagree and think I'm an idiot?

Lol I read that as Charles Barkley nah mut mut gg bff

peatrick said:

I'm also using Charles. He's fantastic in the pass game, my only gripe is the lack of Tank.

Wow 96 redux going for damn near 3 mil

Smith hands down and gets all 32 chems

colbyzg said:

Truzz + FT should be outlawed. Shit is unreal. Truzz > Tank too, no?

About your truzz > Tank thing

It depends. Truzz will help you out unless theres an avalanche. Tank with break an avalanche hit (Unless they have enforcer or something like that). TO ME, I thinl Tank > Truzz, but its a playstyle thing and its about what youd rather risk.