Because all of a sudden my opponents are getting a rash of cheap tips and picks that I never, ever get. This usually occurs in matches where my opponent has low-level abilities and relatively weak rosters.
It hadn't felt so bad for a while until just this morning.
I'm confident they do...can "slide" right in the middle of the game. I have actually found lower ranking teams getting more "breaks" against me then the higher ranked teams. If I see low 90s in their top players I'm fairly sure I'm about to be subjected to some BS.
I recently played a guy with a full tt of ULs and high over cards. I ended up forcing a fumble on his first pass and then had my defense play lights out and ended up scoring after my pick. On the contrary when I play team who's top 3 is 86 ovrs my team can't block for more than 1 second and I have a hard time moving the ball
phatalerror said:Because all of a sudden my opponents are getting a rash of cheap tips and picks that I never, ever get. This usually occurs in matches where my opponent has low-level abilities and relatively weak rosters.
It hadn't felt so bad for a while until just this morning.
Whatever you all need to do to cope .
In short, probably
Massadolphin said:Whatever you all need to do to cope .
I’ve played Monopoly, Scrabble, and various card games for years. Random chance in itself is a necessary evil, and sometimes when you’re trying to take a territory in Risk, you continually roll 1‘s with the red dice while your opponent is 6’s with the white. It’s the way of things.
Random chance in Madden has always felt different, because the odds aren’t the same across the board. Over hundreds of head-to-head experiences this year and in previous iterations of MUT, the games that are hardest are the games that should be the easiest.
If it makes you feel better to think that better consistently beats lesser, I’m not going to convince you otherwise on this forum. If your goal was to make me feel like I’m terrible at MUT, you’ve made no headway on that. Otherwise, I have no idea what you were trying to say here.
Lildrift56 said:I recently played a guy with a full tt of ULs and high over cards. I ended up forcing a fumble on his first pass and then had my defense play lights out and ended up scoring after my pick. On the contrary when I play team who's top 3 is 86 ovrs my team can't block for more than 1 second and I have a hard time moving the ball
Some people need the best players because their skill level is middling, some use lesser player because they don't need better players due to a good scheme. I personally think overall can only make a minimum difference when it comes down to scheme vs team. If I was better I would have all low 90s on a theme team and save all my coins for 99s when they drop. But I'm not, so I make improvements that help me a but in my personal scheme
RobStillRules1 said:Some people need the best players because their skill level is middling, some use lesser player because they don't need better players due to a good scheme. I personally think overall can only make a minimum difference when it comes down to scheme vs team. If I was better I would have all low 90s on a theme team and save all my coins for 99s when they drop. But I'm not, so I make improvements that help me a but in my personal scheme
Ur literrilly a trash bag with a patriots beanie stfu
Daddy said:Ur literrilly a trash bag with a patriots beanie stfu
I've moved onto the patriots ass less chaps, thank you very much
phatalerror said:I’ve played Monopoly, Scrabble, and various card games for years. Random chance in itself is a necessary evil, and sometimes when you’re trying to take a territory in Risk, you continually roll 1‘s with the red dice while your opponent is 6’s with the white. It’s the way of things.
Random chance in Madden has always felt different, because the odds aren’t the same across the board. Over hundreds of head-to-head experiences this year and in previous iterations of MUT, the games that are hardest are the games that should be the easiest.
If it makes you feel better to think that better consistently beats lesser, I’m not going to convince you otherwise on this forum. If your goal was to make me feel like I’m terrible at MUT, you’ve made no headway on that. Otherwise, I have no idea what you were trying to say here.
If Monopoly had an option to pay money to get more dice to roll each turn and turn the odds in your favor then the analogy would work better.
I got mossed by 90 courtland Sutton twice in my playoffs to lose 28-26, game is so rigged😭
phatalerror said:I’ve played Monopoly, Scrabble, and various card games for years. Random chance in itself is a necessary evil, and sometimes when you’re trying to take a territory in Risk, you continually roll 1‘s with the red dice while your opponent is 6’s with the white. It’s the way of things.
Random chance in Madden has always felt different, because the odds aren’t the same across the board. Over hundreds of head-to-head experiences this year and in previous iterations of MUT, the games that are hardest are the games that should be the easiest.
If it makes you feel better to think that better consistently beats lesser, I’m not going to convince you otherwise on this forum. If your goal was to make me feel like I’m terrible at MUT, you’ve made no headway on that. Otherwise, I have no idea what you were trying to say here.
You can be good at MUT and still not accept your losss . I'll never make an assumption your bad at the game but you might be a sore loser .
Massadolphin said:You can be good at MUT and still not accept your losss . I'll never make an assumption your bad at the game but you might be a sore loser .
If I didn't win nine in a row in Monopoly playing against opponents of relatively equal skill, well, of course, because random chance plays a huge role in how that game plays out. And *no sane person* will undertake an endeavor where they are substantially rewarded for winning nine games of Monopoly in a row.
It's at times hard to accept losses in MUT for what's at stake. If you're a sore loser at Chess, you're a sore loser period, as you can't blame luck for a loss. The MUT experience is different, as you have to contend with underhanded exploits coupled with random chance that often punishes players not leaning heavily into exploits. So you lose to inferior players with predictable tactics that are effective solely because you were trying to cover Cheese #2 and Cheese #11 when they randomly executed Cheese #17. Or you lose because of a clutch underthrow or overthrow when you saw the blitz and had a receiver wide open.
Being a sore loser is being a sore loser, and MUT is training me to be a sore loser... I'm seeing it. But it's not because I'm losing in an analogue of Chess. I'm losing principally to cheese, and every once in a while, I play out a game against a guy who sticks to orthodox football, and it ends up being a good game. And when the game is winding down, the majority of those games will end with a late score, and when the opponent finishes me off with a one-point win on a two-point conversion via RPO, well, that sucks.