Tossing up whether I purchase Pitts or keep usering Simmons.
Don’t have the room for midzone on him and kinda miss it for the plays i get cheated from a user pick but he’d KO it for me
wondering if Pitts is the move at user, Simmons moves so well which is my main reason i’ve stayed in him despite the AP costs of LA and Midzone (2AP)
I tried Pitts as a user and he didn’t move well enough for me. I’m using his TE card at TE1 and he plays very well. I’ve got Nitschke (40/40 packers) and Lynch at SubLb, both are pretty good.
Honestly if you’re still running pink Von Miller I would recommend selling and free up the 4AP to be able to use Simmons. I recorded some games over the weekend and noticed if anyone has Edge Protector my pink Von Miller rarely lights up (less than 5 times in a complete game) now and couldn’t get around these guys at all. 3 man and 4 man fronts, didn’t matter which. Not even top tier o-linemen, one opponent had Lane Johnson and the other was Willie Anderson.
id keep using simmons, pitts like the rest of those tall users don't rlly play well as a user imo. hard to bait for picks, but they are great as off LB.
SlowAndSteady said:I tried Pitts as a user and he didn’t move well enough for me. I’m using his TE card at TE1 and he plays very well. I’ve got Nitschke (40/40 packers) and Lynch at SubLb, both are pretty good.
Honestly if you’re still running pink Von Miller I would recommend selling and free up the 4AP to be able to use Simmons. I recorded some games over the weekend and noticed if anyone has Edge Protector my pink Von Miller rarely lights up (less than 5 times in a complete game) now and couldn’t get around these guys at all. 3 man and 4 man fronts, didn’t matter which. Not even top tier o-linemen, one opponent had Lane Johnson and the other was Willie Anderson.
hmm these are good points, i think he will be the first to go if i do move on. Probably grab Julius peppers with Edge threat and no outsiders
George with unstoppable force is still dominating up the middle for me
i have enough for a Genki force BND, but if I get the fusion i can run washington theme team chem on him for +1 speed… i was thinking he could also be a great OLB for 3-4 sets when ever i am in them if i went fusion route
RyyoLurkedEm said:hmm these are good points, i think he will be the first to go if i do move on. Probably grab Julius peppers with Edge threat and no outsiders
George with unstoppable force is still dominating up the middle for me
i have enough for a Genki force BND, but if I get the fusion i can run washington theme team chem on him for +1 speed… i was thinking he could also be a great OLB for 3-4 sets when ever i am in them if i went fusion route
I took your advice on George at DT1 and he is by far the most dominant d-lineman I’ve had.
That makes sense if you run 20 Washington for the +1 SPD. I think he would be fine if CPU controlled.
Pitts moves like OOP Gronkowski if you used his card during ZC. Very clunky and slow even though his stats say he should feel better. Definitely stick with Simmons.
SlowAndSteady said:I took your advice on George at DT1 and he is by far the most dominant d-lineman I’ve had.
That makes sense if you run 20 Washington for the +1 SPD. I think he would be fine if CPU controlled.
He is crazy there man. Game changer for sure, was the same last year. Unstoppable force/Colossus is just so dominant up the middle
I put an x factor on him too, I did under pressure because he always gets TFL or sacks, so he then gets that x factor for 8 plays where he still wrecks the play even if he doesn’t get the sack
RyyoLurkedEm said:He is crazy there man. Game changer for sure, was the same last year. Unstoppable force/Colossus is just so dominant up the middle
I put an x factor on him too, I did under pressure because he always gets TFL or sacks, so he then gets that x factor for 8 plays where he still wrecks the play even if he doesn’t get the sack
That sounds like a good use of an x-factor. Might be my next move since I rarely even assign regular X-factors anymore.