How many of your losses would you consider to be to actually good players?
I can honestly say, I've played maybe one out of my last 10 losses. The rest have been arrogant, cheese players and glitchy ass cornballs with paid for teams.
All in all, if anybody actually wants to play , lets run it because these arrogant ass pay for win cornballs are driving me insane.
ksad727 said:How many of your losses would you consider to be to actually good players?
I can honestly say, I've played maybe one out of my last 10 losses. The rest have been arrogant, cheese players and glitchy ass cornballs with paid for teams.
All in all, if anybody actually wants to play , lets run it because these arrogant ass pay for win cornballs are driving me insane.
Its summer, so a lot of immature young kids are studying youtube for hours a day to learn all the METAs
They will play toxic...running hurryups, using that glitch short onsides kick
They dont spend money on their teams, but when they have the time to play 8 hours a day...of course they will have huge coin stacks
ksad727 said:How many of your losses would you consider to be to actually good players?
I can honestly say, I've played maybe one out of my last 10 losses. The rest have been arrogant, cheese players and glitchy ass cornballs with paid for teams.
All in all, if anybody actually wants to play , lets run it because these arrogant ass pay for win cornballs are driving me insane.
You playing squads, or H2H stuff? I want to play, but i also need to invest what limited game-time i have towards the various Field Pass requirements, so i'm bouncing around trying to keep pace.
It's rare, but there's at least one or two players each and every week that i just have to tip my hat to and acknowledge that I'm having a terrible day, or simply cannot compete with various roll-out and sideline mechanics that count a "catch" despite the ball being knocked out on the sidelines. I'm not competent or consistent enough to continually abuse those same mechanics, which is obviously a skill gap issue on my part.
Had a hilarious come from behind victory late last evening, was down 0-14 in a huge hole to start the game, but managed to crawl my way back. Had a chance to try and seal the clutch victory with 4th and goal from the ~six yard line, but i pussied out and took the three points, hoping to rely on my defense. Sure enough, dude managed to waltz down the field and kick his own FG to tie the game with less than a minute to play.
Nice return placed me at my own forty, so i gave myself a chance to avoid overtime. First play, Flood, with two streaks on the same side of the field... if those weren't open, i was going to dump it off and run out of bounds (only had 1 timeout remaining). My dual streaks ended up splitting the defender and lucky grab allowed me to zoom down the field inside the twenty. From there, i just ran out the clock and burned my final time out with 0:02 remaining. Kicked the final FG to seal the 27-24 victory and proceeded to call my opponent a pussy, because he spent most of the second half talking shit.
I'd prefer to finish games by saying "GG" but you know the drill, arrogant ass cornballs. I did surprisingly decent against his Vanguard cheese.
ksad727 said:How many of your losses would you consider to be to actually good players?
I can honestly say, I've played maybe one out of my last 10 losses. The rest have been arrogant, cheese players and glitchy ass cornballs with paid for teams.
All in all, if anybody actually wants to play , lets run it because these arrogant ass pay for win cornballs are driving me insane.
I lose to "lesser" players just as often as I win versus "better" players.
80% of the games I play are the meta cheeseball garbage.
I hate that I chalk up so many L’s against players whose users are just lost on defense, but whose defensive linemen just RNG me to death. Shed, shed, shed, again and again. But I never seem to get the same thing.
Sometimes I am instead the recipient of RNG love. Which makes the game feel like it’s a lot less about skill and more about dice rolls.
