Ive only found one pb with a formation that had 5 wr did they really take it out of the game? i wanted to run a empty fast spread attack no need for a rb in empty when a WR is a ton more useful.
CarpeDiemCras88
Posts: 82 |
320
JuicyJ8787
Posts: 907 |
6
Run n Gun playbook
CarpeDiemCras88
Posts: 82 |
320
JuicyJ8787 said:Run n Gun playbook
Yeah that's what I'm running now I'm just surprised it's only an option for 1 playbook I was hoping I was missing something what's the best 4wr 1 the that people are liking?
54murdock
OVR
88
Posts: 24 |
4,559
Run n Gun. Go Chiefs !!!!
Qslant
Posts: 156 |
180
I run sf pb. It has 5wr. Fyi
Qslant
Posts: 156 |
180
San Francisco playbook. Has 5wr
antitwisted
Posts: 762 |
321
Qslant said:San Francisco playbook. Has 5wr
Yeah but I've looked and don't see any 5 WR formations in there unless maybe there's a package that allows it or I've overlooked it somehow. Empty base flex is not a 5 WR formation in terms of personnel if that's what you meant.
Millennium69
Posts: 114 |
2,995
You might have to look at the packages in empty formations. GB DAL and SF had them in the past.
Log in to join the conversation