Toxic H2H

I’ll add that will change how I play dramatically depending on how the game is going. I am a run first, second and always kind of player, but I will come out in an empty set and pass like I know what I’m doing. Probably looks like the game suddenly loves me. Been playing MUT since 2011. My H2H wins were mine  with some luck going my way and my losses were because my opponent beat me And the occasional dropped pick because the RNG is real.

akurro33 said:

If that was true why wouldn't this have been discovered yet. Maddens been around a long time and its the same game copy and pasted. EA is not competent enough to code that sort of thing into this game. I'd maybe believe this was in the game if they even had a shred of competency but with all the bugs there's no way it's in there lmao I can't believe this stuff gets parroted over and over.

Also, if it were in the game, then what would be the point of spending any money if it's always gonna be close anyway? This fallback on DDA is just people trying to justify why they couldn't adjust when they other team did.

It has been discovered and the MUT veterans admit to DDA wins and losses.

blitzfist said:

It has been discovered and the MUT veterans admit to DDA wins and losses.

Source?

Martyr1968 said:

Actually they haven't exactly said that. They worded their statements very carefully. 

EA DOES have a patent on an equalizing code. It's public knowledge.  It's in other game modes.  The code has actually been listed by coding experts. EA tiptoes around how they say it is or is not functional within MUT H2h. 

But they absolutely have a DDA equivalent code . It's fact. So why wouldn't they use it to make more money by keeping games  close to make customers want better cards???

https://www.ea.com/en-gb/news/fair-play-and-dynamic-difficulty-adjustment

While EA does own a patent for DDA technology, that technology never was in FIFA, Madden or NHL, and never will be.  We would not use DDA technology to give players an advantage or disadvantage in online multiplayer modes in any of our games and we absolutely do not have it in FIFA, Madden or NHL.

Doesn't sound like tiptoeing around anything to me here. They were literally sued over it and the people sueing them had to drop the case because it is not in the game. Again, all this complaining about DDA is people convincing themselves that they didn't lose a game but it was stolen from them, when in fact, they failed to adjust like their opponent did in all examples.

akurro33 said:

Source?

There is no source. He's full of shit pretty much

SportsPerson94 said:

There is no source. He's full of shit pretty much

I know lol

akurro33 said:

Source?

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20170259177A1/en

You can start with the official patent if you like.  Most deniers chose to use the "players only complain about DDA when they lose" argument but DDA has been around for so long that hasn't been true in years.  You need to get up to speed.

blitzfist said:

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20170259177A1/en

You can start with the official patent if you like.  Most deniers chose to use the "players only complain about DDA when they lose" argument but DDA has been around for so long that hasn't been true in years.  You need to get up to speed.

Means absolutely nothing. Like i said, full of shit.

blitzfist said:

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20170259177A1/en

You can start with the official patent if you like.  Most deniers chose to use the "players only complain about DDA when they lose" argument but DDA has been around for so long that hasn't been true in years.  You need to get up to speed.

I will reiterate my response to someone else below:

https://www.ea.com/en-gb/news/fair-play-and-dynamic-difficulty-adjustment

While EA does own a patent for DDA technology, that technology never was in FIFA, Madden or NHL, and never will be.  We would not use DDA technology to give players an advantage or disadvantage in online multiplayer modes in any of our games and we absolutely do not have it in FIFA, Madden or NHL.

Doesn't sound like tiptoeing around anything to me here. They were literally sued over it and the people sueing them had to drop the case because it is not in the game. Again, all this complaining about DDA is people convincing themselves that they didn't lose a game but it was stolen from them, when in fact, they failed to adjust like their opponent did in all examples.

Just because they have a patent doesn't mean it's in the game as shown above. Why would they not use it in the game if they have a patent for it? Follow the money. If they put that in the game with all of these microtransactions they would lose a TON of money due to lawsuits like the one brought against them that was ultimately dropped, because... and wait for this... it was not in the game.

Keep believing what you want. Just because you believe something to be true, does not make it so. Anyone that can be convinced of a claim without the person claiming it able to provide proof/support for their claim is simply a sheep. Bet yall think we never landed on the moon too. Use your head and have a bit of healthy skepticsm boys.

akurro33 said:

I will reiterate my response to someone else below:

https://www.ea.com/en-gb/news/fair-play-and-dynamic-difficulty-adjustment

While EA does own a patent for DDA technology, that technology never was in FIFA, Madden or NHL, and never will be.  We would not use DDA technology to give players an advantage or disadvantage in online multiplayer modes in any of our games and we absolutely do not have it in FIFA, Madden or NHL.

Doesn't sound like tiptoeing around anything to me here. They were literally sued over it and the people sueing them had to drop the case because it is not in the game. Again, all this complaining about DDA is people convincing themselves that they didn't lose a game but it was stolen from them, when in fact, they failed to adjust like their opponent did in all examples.

Just because they have a patent doesn't mean it's in the game as shown above. Why would they not use it in the game if they have a patent for it? Follow the money. If they put that in the game with all of these microtransactions they would lose a TON of money due to lawsuits like the one brought against them that was ultimately dropped, because... and wait for this... it was not in the game.

Keep believing what you want. Just because you believe something to be true, does not make it so. Anyone that can be convinced of a claim without the person claiming it able to provide proof/support for their claim is simply a sheep. Bet yall think we never landed on the moon too. Use your head and have a bit of healthy skepticsm boys.

Your last paragraph sounds desperate.

blitzfist said:

Your last paragraph sounds desperate.

You sound really weird trying to prove something that isn't true. Relax, it's just a game. It's ok to lose sometimes. Sometimes, the other player is just better than you

blitzfist said:

Your last paragraph sounds desperate.

When someone you're arguing with abandons their argument for insults or personal attacks, you know they no longer have anything left to offer.

If you continue to believe what you believe when presented with facts showing the opposite viewpoint and stick with yours out of spite, stubborness, or downright denial then there's not much more to say.

Try critical thinking for once. Being wrong is not a bad thing. Refusing to adjust your worldview when presented with new facts is.

akurro33 said:

When someone you're arguing with abandons their argument for insults or personal attacks, you know they no longer have anything left to offer.

If you continue to believe what you believe when presented with facts showing the opposite viewpoint and stick with yours out of spite, stubborness, or downright denial then there's not much more to say.

Try critical thinking for once. Being wrong is not a bad thing. Refusing to adjust your worldview when presented with new facts is.

LOL

You know nothing about me.  I use critical thinking at my job daily.  You are doing exactly what you are accusing me of.  You also have presented zero facts.  If an official patent isn't proof I don't know what is.

akurro33 said:

I will reiterate my response to someone else below:

https://www.ea.com/en-gb/news/fair-play-and-dynamic-difficulty-adjustment

While EA does own a patent for DDA technology, that technology never was in FIFA, Madden or NHL, and never will be.  We would not use DDA technology to give players an advantage or disadvantage in online multiplayer modes in any of our games and we absolutely do not have it in FIFA, Madden or NHL.

Doesn't sound like tiptoeing around anything to me here. They were literally sued over it and the people sueing them had to drop the case because it is not in the game. Again, all this complaining about DDA is people convincing themselves that they didn't lose a game but it was stolen from them, when in fact, they failed to adjust like their opponent did in all examples.

Just because they have a patent doesn't mean it's in the game as shown above. Why would they not use it in the game if they have a patent for it? Follow the money. If they put that in the game with all of these microtransactions they would lose a TON of money due to lawsuits like the one brought against them that was ultimately dropped, because... and wait for this... it was not in the game.

Keep believing what you want. Just because you believe something to be true, does not make it so. Anyone that can be convinced of a claim without the person claiming it able to provide proof/support for their claim is simply a sheep. Bet yall think we never landed on the moon too. Use your head and have a bit of healthy skepticsm boys.

You seem to not understand absolutely anything about DDA, EA and legal matters.

I will summarize it for you : 

1. EA owns a patent for DDA, that they spent time and money on

2. EA is NOT obliged to tell you anything about technologies they use in their games since we don't have ANY legal video game regulations

3. The lawsuit that you are talking about was not about DDA , it was about pay to win mechanics in terms of getting cards from packs and it wasn't dropped, plaintiffs got paid off to piss off

4. They use false advertising every single year without suffering any type of consequences (read point nr. 2)

5. They are a lazy company that releases the same game every single year so it's pretty obvious that if they developed a new technology, it's being used

6. There is PLENTY of evidence confirming DDA's existence gathered throughout last decade, including certain professional players saying it is in the game (from all of the EA online games)

There is probably couple other points that I could have used but you get the point. It's incredibly ignorant of you to avoid critical and logical thinking, believing everything that this toxic corporation is saying, without actually checking the facts.

I would suggest to use your brain sometimes, because you truly look like a bot right now, considering the fact that there is at least a bunch of the EXACT SAME posts from different accounts every single day. (literally using the same manner of writing and using the exact same arguments and phrases)