QB283 said:Agreed. In addition, too many members of the committee seem to show conflict of interest and very inconsistent criteria. They ranked FSU above Georgia because they were an undefeated conference champion, yet placed Alabama ahead of FSU. If FSU is better than Georgia, and Alabama only managed to win by 3 against Georgia, wouldn't that suggest that FSU's record would placed them ahead of Alabama? Michigan and Washington make sense. They had to drag Texas into the playoffs to justify Alabama, meaning FSU got the cold shoulder.
Yeah I think it's cause it would be the first time in a while the sec got left out they may have not wanted to do that so they shafted a undefeated team