I've only seen a few compared to what we've had in the past. It makes it much more difficult and not as much fun putting a team together.
BillGardiner20
Posts: 596 |
2,560
SquishySoldier21
Posts: 1075 |
2,480
BillGardiner20 said:I've only seen a few compared to what we've had in the past. It makes it much more difficult and not as much fun putting a team together.
"it makes it much more difficult"
Thats exactly WHY. They want it to be as difficult as possible to have a top tier team unless you spend money. Alot of money.
Managing your theme teams too easily/having too much flexibility is exactly what they DONT WANT.
Were like, man wtf barmore is really more of a dt than de if you were gonna limit him to one... And why only le, i have a slot at re i could use him at (again dt would be even better)
EAs like, tough break. Guess you need to buy a ne dt or re. More money for us!
Thats really how they see it. Plus theyre lazy and this requires minimum effort so, to them, win win.
BillGardiner20
Posts: 596 |
2,560
I'm NMS, or as close as I can get, and I have two or three good players with IRL secondary positions that I can't fit into my lineup.
Last edited by
BillGardiner20
- ,
edited 1
time in total.
Charmingjmor
Posts: 676 |
1,855
SquishySoldier21 said:"it makes it much more difficult"
Thats exactly WHY. They want it to be as difficult as possible to have a top tier team unless you spend money. Alot of money.
Managing your theme teams too easily/having too much flexibility is exactly what they DONT WANT.
Were like, man wtf barmore is really more of a dt than de if you were gonna limit him to one... And why only le, i have a slot at re i could use him at (again dt would be even better)
EAs like, tough break. Guess you need to buy a ne dt or re. More money for us!
Thats really how they see it. Plus theyre lazy and this requires minimum effort so, to them, win win.
Very well said. To sum it up - Greed.