Woolen or Willis from 97 set pack?

I need help figuring out which card fits me best, not just which card is better. I run 50/50 49er TT, run cover 2/3, and would like the card to be endgame for me. Thinking about going PA and combine Universal Coverage on Woolen or LA and combine Duel Threat on Willis. I like Willis as slightly more endgame because he also has insane pass rush stats with Duel Threat for 1 AP. I am willing to take suggestions for any other cards, these 2 are the cards I have filtered down to.

Woolen is the better card but Willis will have a longer shelf life on a Niners TT. At worst he'll be an end game user with 98spd/98accell using up 0AP.

I have both. Willis makes a bigger impact for me. When that dual threat is on he’s a machine. 
 

u can’t go wrong with either Because Woolen is endgame as well with 1ap Dzko and 49ers theme team lack of cbs with ap discounts

Have both as well and I second willis best MLB and Sublb user potentially whereas woolen being tall and armed with mzko and flat zone KO is the perfect slot corner. You can’t go wrong.

Jhays45 said:

Have both as well and I second willis best MLB and Sublb user potentially whereas woolen being tall and armed with mzko and flat zone KO is the perfect slot corner. You can’t go wrong.

I'm focusing on AP stacks; there are better stacks than that (Peanut). The only thing that makes him stand out is having every KO and PA, plus the crazy height.

Harrison Phillips gets 1ap colossus  with 0 ap Inside stuff. 

That is likely more endgame than any other defensive card out right now. Woolen is also good, and that is who I took. I am now wishing I would have taken Phillips.

I wouldnt take Willis because he is shorter and youre Likely going to want the new Ted Hendricks and probably a GT LB/User that is taller. Maybe a new Carmichael. 

Woolen and Phillips are best gets. I should have taken Phillips, but Woolen is good as well.

Surgical0ffense said:

Harrison Phillips gets 1ap colossus  with 0 ap Inside stuff. 

That is likely more endgame than any other defensive card out right now. Woolen is also good, and that is who I took. I am now wishing I would have taken Phillips.

I wouldnt take Willis because he is shorter and youre Likely going to want the new Ted Hendricks and probably a GT LB/User that is taller. Maybe a new Carmichael. 

Woolen and Phillips are best gets. I should have taken Phillips, but Woolen is good as well.

Phillips was one of my later cross-offs because he gets inside stuff for 1 ap, not 0.

simpli said:

Phillips was one of my later cross-offs because he gets inside stuff for 1 ap, not 0.

You're right. Its Colossus and Interior threat for a total of 1ap.

simpli said:

I need help figuring out which card fits me best, not just which card is better. I run 50/50 49er TT, run cover 2/3, and would like the card to be endgame for me. Thinking about going PA and combine Universal Coverage on Woolen or LA and combine Duel Threat on Willis. I like Willis as slightly more endgame because he also has insane pass rush stats with Duel Threat for 1 AP. I am willing to take suggestions for any other cards, these 2 are the cards I have filtered down to.

I went through an eerily similar scenario, I'm still running hybrid 70/70 Superbowl & 25/50 Niners (also 6/6 AKA Crews & 15/60 Combine), because it's been difficult to give up on 98-99 SPD everywhere, with amazing discounted abilities.

Hopefully Theme Team Remix will motivate me to commit to my full 50/50 squad.

Ultimately, what tipped my personal decision, it came down to position of greatest need. I have Fred Warner and Bo Jackson for my SUBLB2 options, at the moment I prefer having one Secure Tackler (Bo) and one Mid Zone KO (with LurkArtist, of course, which only Fred gets for 0AP). This allowed me to slide Ji'Ayir Brown back to his natural position at SS, because I ended up taking Tariq Woolen. Using Mid + Deep for 2AP, but you can't teach height. Outside corners with height (such as Randy Moss CB) are just able to cover so much more vertical real estate on the grass. Unless/until we start getting Golden Ticket or OOP DBs, there's only a handful of NBA sized defensive backs in the game to choose from, let alone one with elite stats AND abilities. 

Broke my heart, Patrick Willis probably top 5 all time favorite 49ers players, he was really special and an absolute pleasure to watch. Mostly just including this to help convey that I did not make this Riq roster choice lightly. And he's lived up to the hype. Eventually built Peanut Tillman AKA Crews set to have another elite corner opposite Tariq, with Sauce and our boy Charvarius Ward in the Slot. Eventually I'll move Peanut to Slot, he's also been fantastic, almost as great as Tariq.

It's really incredibly rare (at least it seems this way, especially lately) that we get to make such truly important and impactful roster decisions. I almost always prefer to take 49ers players as BND options, but ended up breaking my own rule here and zero regrets after a few days with Woolen. Clearly CB1.

peatrick said:

I went through an eerily similar scenario, I'm still running hybrid 70/70 Superbowl & 25/50 Niners (also 6/6 AKA Crews & 15/60 Combine), because it's been difficult to give up on 98-99 SPD everywhere, with amazing discounted abilities.

Hopefully Theme Team Remix will motivate me to commit to my full 50/50 squad.

Ultimately, what tipped my personal decision, it came down to position of greatest need. I have Fred Warner and Bo Jackson for my SUBLB2 options, at the moment I prefer having one Secure Tackler (Bo) and one Mid Zone KO (with LurkArtist, of course, which only Fred gets for 0AP). This allowed me to slide Ji'Ayir Brown back to his natural position at SS, because I ended up taking Tariq Woolen. Using Mid + Deep for 2AP, but you can't teach height. Outside corners with height (such as Randy Moss CB) are just able to cover so much more vertical real estate on the grass. Unless/until we start getting Golden Ticket or OOP DBs, there's only a handful of NBA sized defensive backs in the game to choose from, let alone one with elite stats AND abilities. 

Broke my heart, Patrick Willis probably top 5 all time favorite 49ers players, he was really special and an absolute pleasure to watch. Mostly just including this to help convey that I did not make this Riq roster choice lightly. And he's lived up to the hype. Eventually built Peanut Tillman AKA Crews set to have another elite corner opposite Tariq, with Sauce and our boy Charvarius Ward in the Slot. Eventually I'll move Peanut to Slot, he's also been fantastic, almost as great as Tariq.

It's really incredibly rare (at least it seems this way, especially lately) that we get to make such truly important and impactful roster decisions. I almost always prefer to take 49ers players as BND options, but ended up breaking my own rule here and zero regrets after a few days with Woolen. Clearly CB1.

Im playing champs as we speak, had him on a hard flat, he sprints at the ball as he's 3-4 yards away from it, snatches it before the receiver, and he takes the pick 100 yards for 6. Im excited about him.

simpli said:

Im playing champs as we speak, had him on a hard flat, he sprints at the ball as he's 3-4 yards away from it, snatches it before the receiver, and he takes the pick 100 yards for 6. Im excited about him.

Bravo with your roster upgrade, feels amazing to draft premier talent to the squad.

Sorry I'm being dense, you ended up with Patrick? Or Riq. So many good choices, wonderful problem to have.

I went Woolen for 2 reasons - 

1) is AP set up is awesome & CB has a large depth chart, so I can have him for a while

2) I had the LTD version and was able to sell for 1.2 mil

I took Vernon Davis. I would not recommend though. He's been just ok. I feel TOTY Laporta was much better

peatrick said:

Bravo with your roster upgrade, feels amazing to draft premier talent to the squad.

Sorry I'm being dense, you ended up with Patrick? Or Riq. So many good choices, wonderful problem to have.

took Riq, hes balling