I just opened a chat with EA support and they are logging the issue - I would suggest anyone else with concerns on these being in packs do the same so that they can look into it and if warranted, issue a makeright to those affected.
Charmingjmor
Posts: 674 |
1,855
waggy122
Posts: 52 |
205
RonaldDobbs said:I get they are limited. I am just irritated with EA for not having them in the packs. It’s just the principle. I was and still am fine with spending $30 today at a chance for an LTD. I honestly would not have bought if I knew that the only LTD chance was the 94 WR Moss. I get that if the CA 94s were in packs it wouldn’t have been a guarantee to pull one. Just feeling fleeced by EA.
“If” there was a make right I’d argue a refund of your funds and a return of coins to them. Not a flood of more free packs that hurts the community.
RonaldDobbs
Posts: 1168 |
5
waggy122 said:“If” there was a make right I’d argue a refund of your funds and a return of coins to them. Not a flood of more free packs that hurts the community.
I’m on board with that. I also don’t think there should be a free 94.
SportsPerson94
Posts: 4154 |
380
Idk what to tell you guys. Next time buy them the day they come out instead of taking the chance buying a day after and assuming they are in there. At least you know for sure that the LTD is in there the day the pack comes out. Like someone said above, you gambled and lost
RonaldDobbs
Posts: 1168 |
5
SportsPerson94 said:Idk what to tell you guys. Next time buy them the day they come out instead of taking the chance buying a day after and assuming they are in there. At least you know for sure that the LTD is in there the day the pack comes out. Like someone said above, you gambled and lost
I don’t know why you are arguing. I didn’t buy them yesterday, because I didn’t care about getting the 94 WR Moss. I bought them today for a chance at a 94 LTD CA card. They weren’t in any of the packs for anyone in the pack offer. That’s not gambling and losing. That is false advertisement.
Millennium69
Posts: 73 |
2,350
I think the pack is mislabeled. I wouldn't have gotten the pack if the chance at a CA player wasnt in there.
RonaldDobbs
Posts: 1168 |
5
Millennium69 said:I think the pack is mislabeled. I wouldn't have gotten the pack if the chance at a CA player wasnt in there.
Yeah, same here.
SportsPerson94
Posts: 4154 |
380
RonaldDobbs said:I don’t know why you are arguing. I didn’t buy them yesterday, because I didn’t care about getting the 94 WR Moss. I bought them today for a chance at a 94 LTD CA card. They weren’t in any of the packs for anyone in the pack offer. That’s not gambling and losing. That is false advertisement.
I didn't argue at all but you guys gambled and lost. There is no false advertisement. If you pulled a 94 CA, you would have posted about the packs being amazing
RonaldDobbs
Posts: 1168 |
5
SportsPerson94 said:I didn't argue at all but you guys gambled and lost. There is no false advertisement. If you pulled a 94 CA, you would have posted about the packs being amazing
I have heard that the 94 CA cards weren’t in any of the platinum packs for anyone. Only in the CA packs.
jaybird
Posts: 276 |
8,720
That was better luck than me. Only three 86 for me. And of course…no LTD.
SportsPerson94
Posts: 4154 |
380
RonaldDobbs said:I have heard that the 94 CA cards weren’t in any of the platinum packs for anyone. Only in the CA packs.
Maybe somehow Moss was still the 94 that you can pull? I'm not sure how EA does it tbh
elmango30
Posts: 1745 |
0
SportsPerson94 said:I didn't argue at all but you guys gambled and lost. There is no false advertisement. If you pulled a 94 CA, you would have posted about the packs being amazing
if LTDs aren’t in packs that advertise LTDs it’s false advertisement in a way. They didn’t specify which LTDs would be available and moss is still in packs. If the packs were there tomorrow when moss has left packs and there weren’t any cover athletes the argument would still be better. A random BND for anyone who opened one of those packs after 10:30 eastern is, imo, the best solution. CA weren’t in packs that they should have been in. People wanted them. Give them a random BND one to not hurt the market too much, but to still give some utility
SportsPerson94
Posts: 4154 |
380
elmango30 said:if LTDs aren’t in packs that advertise LTDs it’s false advertisement in a way. They didn’t specify which LTDs would be available and moss is still in packs. If the packs were there tomorrow when moss has left packs and there weren’t any cover athletes the argument would still be better. A random BND for anyone who opened one of those packs after 10:30 eastern is, imo, the best solution. CA weren’t in packs that they should have been in. People wanted them. Give them a random BND one to not hurt the market too much, but to still give some utility
A random 94 bnd? Lol how?
elmango30
Posts: 1745 |
0
SportsPerson94 said:A random 94 bnd? Lol how?
It’s what they’ve done before when cards that were advertised to be in packs weren’t in packs that they were advertised to be in. An influx of non BNDs would hurt the market
this pack says
”you can get a 94 LTD”
if not all 94 LTDs are in the pack that is, in fact, false advertisement. It’s not that we didn’t pull cover athletes - it’s that they were not in that pack in the first place
weplaythose
Posts: 2224 |
4,723
RonaldDobbs said:I decided since it was Christmas I would buy 3 of those special offers of 82 or 86, 86 or 94 packs. I got a total of four 86s and two 82s. Terrible luck for me. Oh well, Merry Christmas everyone, and hopefully you have much better luck than me.
Same, oh well, its still nearly a million coins, so no complaints here