yeah this is kinda late BUT - did EA disrespect Moss by giving him 87 JMP, 88 SPC ?

Last Post
Posts: 1138 |
1,960
#1

that's a definitive YES IMO - it's one thing to be horrible at coding which is your main job but to me even worse to be that bad at understanding what players should be rated... comical that 87 AKA Deion Sanders has a better SPC than Randy... wtf... only logical explanation (as always) is they nerf free cards... still super disrespectful tho, and that's not taking into account his SPD / movement attributes which make more sense given the release time / max SPD thresholds of players....

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 256 |
1,693
#2

EA been mad disrespectful this year. To Moss, Sean T, Paul Krause, always putting Deion's press low, they are foul.

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 1138 |
1,960
#3
Droopy34 said:

EA been mad disrespectful this year. To Moss, Sean T, Paul Krause, always putting Deion's press low, they are foul.

hyped for the new Sean T card tomorrow tho, immediately going in as FS1

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 256 |
1,693
#4
StoicTrader said:

hyped for the new Sean T card tomorrow tho, immediately going in as FS1

just don't ever put him in man coverage with that 60 man cover rating.... and 84 pursuit... man they did him wrong just like how u pointed out they did Moss dirty

Reply with quote Send DM Report
Posts: 1138 |
1,960
#5
Droopy34 said:

just don't ever put him in man coverage with that 60 man cover rating.... and 84 pursuit... man they did him wrong just like how u pointed out they did Moss dirty

true, my safeties almost always in zone so he should be good, but yeah I feel that

Reply with quote Send DM Report

Post Reply