Only weakness is doesnt have the play ball aggressive trait
But 93 speed, 92 accell...over 90 in both man/zone coverage...decent catching
jimshredder
Posts: 516 |
966
Martyr1968
Posts: 4022 |
6,248
jimshredder said:Only weakness is doesnt have the play ball aggressive trait
But 93 speed, 92 accell...over 90 in both man/zone coverage...decent catching
Jimmie Ward may be better. I have Ward, Branch, Dawkins and Chinn
Believe it or not Dawkins still seems to make more plays than the other cards
von11
Posts: 771 |
2,574
Per the numbers it looks like it...I would argue Lott is close(ish) and significantly cheaper. If coin were no object then I would go with Branch, but...since it kinda is...I'll stick with Lott.
toddpack90
Posts: 158 |
2,302
Dawkins makes way more plays when it's close, that plays ball in the air trait matters alot from what I've seen. I still like Branch, but he doesn't seem to attack the way Dawkins does.