Pulled BND Parham, already have kyle pitts. both have 90 speed as i have 25/50 MF chem
coins aren’t an issue, can be fine with Parham at TE 2 and keep pitts, just based on stats though who’s better?
RyyoLurkedEm
Posts: 2178 |
6,557
Last edited by
RyyoLurkedEm
- ,
edited 2 times in
total.
StoicTrader
Posts: 1138 |
1,960
walker? Waller is 86 SPD TE... Waller is solid, but Pitts is fastest TE in game, have Waller at TE1 since run Ravens chems and like the way he plays better than Sharpe and Higbee (25 Ravens / 25 Rams)
Last edited by
StoicTrader
- ,
edited 1
time in total.
RyyoLurkedEm
Posts: 2178 |
6,557
StoicTrader said:walker? Waller is 86 SPD TE... Waller is solid, but Pitts is fastest TE in game, have Waller at TE1 since run Ravens chems and like the way he plays better than Sharpe and Higbee (25 Ravens / 25 Rams)
Parham**** slow brain today lol
StoicTrader
Posts: 1138 |
1,960
haha gotcha, whenever it's close and they both fit for me I keep the BND and sell the other player to get coins back, probably what I would do, used Pitts for a little then sold him back but yeah
SportsPerson94
Posts: 4173 |
380
Pitts is always a problem out there when i play against him
Droopy34
Posts: 254 |
1,693
Pitts, unstoppable route tech
PleaseAndThankYou
StrikeFromAbove
Posts: 1733 |
1,076
I'd get Pitts. He's been fantastic for me.
Kharvn
Posts: 180 |
720
Move Pitts to Wr depending who you have
Martyr1968
Posts: 4022 |
6,248
I got em both and Parham gets animations and post catch broken tackles that Pitts doesn't.
Pitts is more like a WR than a TE. I was using him at WR before OBJ & JaMarr came out. No one is replacing DK for me though. Not yet anyway. His card is just built differently
Don't get me wrong, Pitts is great and I still use him along w Parham and MF Kittle but IMO Parham is better...and if you run MF chem 25/50 you get +1 speed on him
Last edited by
Martyr1968
- ,
edited 1
time in total.
TheChamp22
Posts: 1377 |
205
We kinda got a trail run with the free Parham a couple of days ago and I wasn't the biggest fan compared to how good Pitts has been for me. He felt kind of clunky on routes especially underneath and didn't juke as well despite being under the 245 weight threshold. Might just be his player model is a lot thicker than Pitts even though they similar weights and only a couple inches different in height.
I prefer Pitts as my full time TE but if you have the coins Parham in the redzone and then moving Pitts out wide is really good.
toddpack90
Posts: 158 |
2,302
Pitts better for underneath and zigs, Parham great on single coverage crossers and corners.