Legends drop disappointing

I have lived Krause cards in years past but this year they did him like they did Sean T. For anyone who sometimes mans up their safeties  incertain situations this card becomes somewhat unusable,  kinda like the ST card.  66 Man? 

And we've no use for a new LT unless you run a TT. And a pass.coverage OLB?????? What's the point in Madden to use LBs in pass coverage?

To me,  unusable.cards. I do hope that for some of you this is a good drop though

I run cover 1 and cover 3 for the most part so he will be fine in my scheme

sungodxapollo said:

I run cover 1 and cover 3 for the most part so he will be fine in my scheme

In cover 1 you have to make sure he's the safety in zone though. And. If you want to man blitz that also makes it tough. 

Turns out I can't even really use Sean Taylor because of 55 man cvg.

I mean,.Woodson gets FS as secondary position and both he and Polamalu have 90+ man and zone. 

With Simmons as SubLB I can user him ...

But if you leave Krause or Sean 1 on 1 in.man vs a HB or TE,  they're both cooked

The overlap between the cards released thus far is ridiculous. Sean Taylor and Krause are practically the same cards. They also release LBs upon LBs but do very little about DT if they're not LTDs, as an example. Oversaturating some positions and neglecting others, and in the case of Krause it's even with the exact same archetype as the last big release we had at FS.

antitwisted said:

The overlap between the cards released thus far is ridiculous. Sean Taylor and Krause are practically the same cards. They also release LBs upon LBs but do very little about DT if they're not LTDs, as an example. Oversaturating some positions and neglecting others, and in the case of Krause it's even with the exact same archetype as the last big release we had at FS.

Yes they did the same thing with the LT position, releasing 3 iof them back to.back to back. Before that they did it with HBs

But the thing that gets me the most is when they purposely make a card that would normality be great and give it a massive weakness so that people will keep buying packs when newer cards come out. 

55 and 66 man CVG on Sean T and Krauae. Seriously. 

I mean Dave freakin Robinson's OLB card  just got 90 Man cvg. Could anyone at EA justify that Dave Robinson was 25-30 percent better in man coverage IRL than Sean Taylor or Paul Krause. ????  

Everything EA does is to manipulate the market and the customer base. They should put as much effort  into making a solid game based on reality.....

Martyr1968 said:

Yes they did the same thing with the LT position, releasing 3 iof them back to.back to back. Before that they did it with HBs

But the thing that gets me the most is when they purposely make a card that would normality be great and give it a massive weakness so that people will keep buying packs when newer cards come out. 

55 and 66 man CVG on Sean T and Krauae. Seriously. 

I mean Dave freakin Robinson's OLB card  just got 90 Man cvg. Could anyone at EA justify that Dave Robinson was 25-30 percent better in man coverage IRL than Sean Taylor or Paul Krause. ????  

Everything EA does is to manipulate the market and the customer base. They should put as much effort  into making a solid game based on reality.....

Pretty good points and yeah that is ridiculous that an OLB in September has better MCV than Krause or Taylor, haha.

Martyr1968 said:

Yes they did the same thing with the LT position, releasing 3 iof them back to.back to back. Before that they did it with HBs

But the thing that gets me the most is when they purposely make a card that would normality be great and give it a massive weakness so that people will keep buying packs when newer cards come out. 

55 and 66 man CVG on Sean T and Krauae. Seriously. 

I mean Dave freakin Robinson's OLB card  just got 90 Man cvg. Could anyone at EA justify that Dave Robinson was 25-30 percent better in man coverage IRL than Sean Taylor or Paul Krause. ????  

Everything EA does is to manipulate the market and the customer base. They should put as much effort  into making a solid game based on reality.....

so after further investigation of the matter. there trying to stop the loop blitz from happening. i never gone up against the blitz so this is probably a whales in mut champs or all-madden to all-pro seasons type of thing. EA also  is putting back to back limiteds of the same position to dimish the investment of LTDS considering they want nothing more  to put  every economists in madden into a chokehold.

the telling signs of them doing this:

1.EA has been taking solos away to do specific objectives.

2. content use to air out at 10:30 now it airs out at 1:30

3. purchasable levels

4. nerfing the oblivion of any re-roll sets as soon or before they even come out.

EDIT: EA WATCHES US LIKE DESERT VULTURES  NOW TO SAVE THEIR JOB LMAO. (LIKE WE'RE THE PROBLEM.)

Martyr1968 said:

Yes they did the same thing with the LT position, releasing 3 iof them back to.back to back. Before that they did it with HBs

But the thing that gets me the most is when they purposely make a card that would normality be great and give it a massive weakness so that people will keep buying packs when newer cards come out. 

55 and 66 man CVG on Sean T and Krauae. Seriously. 

I mean Dave freakin Robinson's OLB card  just got 90 Man cvg. Could anyone at EA justify that Dave Robinson was 25-30 percent better in man coverage IRL than Sean Taylor or Paul Krause. ????  

Everything EA does is to manipulate the market and the customer base. They should put as much effort  into making a solid game based on reality.....

The difference between 60 and 90 man is like a 500% difference. EA is clueless much of the time.

GOD Awful !!!!! When do we get the Mahomes Legend CARD??? Go Chiefs !!!!

54murdock said:

GOD Awful !!!!! When do we get the Mahomes Legend CARD??? Go Chiefs !!!!

In about 13 years or so

Paul Krause is my favorite player of all time...I agree those man numbers are horrible...but...still gonna be a home for my man on my squad (but..wow that man coverage number is bad).

von11 said:

Paul Krause is my favorite player of all time...I agree those man numbers are horrible...but...still gonna be a home for my man on my squad (but..wow that man coverage number is bad).

I hear you. I built him on Saturday. Krause cards are great. I actually switched my scheme a little to play zone on the back end and in cover 1 hole or something like that I made sure Krause was in zone.

Martyr1968 said:

I hear you. I built him on Saturday. Krause cards are great. I actually switched my scheme a little to play zone on the back end and in cover 1 hole or something like that I made sure Krause was in zone.

Lol...yep I did the same thing.  I changed my whole scheme around to accommodate one card, but Paul is worth it.  Now once Lott drops...Paul will end up in the box as my user (Lott is my second favorite of all time), but there is always gonna be a home for Paul on my team.