Kelce or Edelman for the slot?

I'm conflicted. I'm going to get Gronk's 98 fairly soon, so I decided to go ahead and switch him from FB to TE and move Travis Kelce to WR. Only problem is I'm not sure which should go in the slot. 

Edelman could probably do just fine as a deep threat or outside receiver, but I think most of his success has come from matching up against mostly safeties in the slot. On the other hand, Kelce's size could make him a big matchup problem, and I kinda want to see if I can utilize him similar to how my Georgia Bulldogs utilize Brock Bowers irl.

I think you wouldn't go wrong with either. I haven't used Kelce at all, but Edelman is disgustingly shifty and I'm loving him. He's my primary kick and punt returner and already has 4 or 5 tds. Very very shifty. 

Kelce could be a match up nightmare though because he is indeed huge.

It's an interesting question . Edelman is incredible for me but so is Travis. I know this is counter-intuitive but if you are going to run mostly 5-15 years routes with your slot WR I'd say Edelman but if you're going to run seams and posts,  I'd go Kelce.  

Edelman is just SO good on those shorter routes. 

Let me know which way you go and how it works out for you

FYI Gronk was SO dominant at FB that I left him there even when I got his 98....I am running Kelce and GG Delanie at  TE 1/2  .

Martyr1968 said:

It's an interesting question . Edelman is incredible for me but so is Travis. I know this is counter-intuitive but if you are going to run mostly 5-15 years routes with your slot WR I'd say Edelman but if you're going to run seams and posts,  I'd go Kelce.  

Edelman is just SO good on those shorter routes. 

Let me know which way you go and how it works out for you

FYI Gronk was SO dominant at FB that I left him there even when I got his 98....I am running Kelce and GG Delanie at  TE 1/2  .

I definitely do more seams and posts