droblunts313 said:If you don’t like how MUT works find another game. If you’re posting more negative stuff than positive maybe find something else. I’m really not trying to be mean. I’m just calling it how I see it.
Three posts. I get it. You might reasonably conclude your suggestion has been rejected. Maybe someone else in a similar situation would benefit. But it's questionable that this will be the case here and now, since you're not engaging with them.
phatalerror said:My complaint isn't hard games. My complaint is about being able to play an NFL-licensed football title like it's a football game. RNG is a necessary evil, although how it's employed in Madden has always been a cause for frustration rather than enjoyment.
Join a franchise with special rules to accommodate people who share your opinions. It’s obvious mut isn't for your style of play.
phatalerror said:Three posts. I get it. You might reasonably conclude your suggestion has been rejected. Maybe someone else in a similar situation would benefit. But it's questionable that this will be the case here and now, since you're not engaging with them.
Nice way to deflect what I said. It’s all good. I’m happy with the game and I enjoy playing it. You on the other hand are miserable and like to complain about things you can fix.
spanky1407 said:Join a franchise with special rules to accommodate people who share your opinions. It’s obvious mut isn't for your style of play.
Lmao I literally said the exact same thing to this guy. Hopefully 2 people saying the same thing will help him understand.
spanky1407 said:Join a franchise with special rules to accommodate people who share your opinions. It’s obvious mut isn't for your style of play.
My proposal conceivably would allow users the luxury of playing football-like games against more than a handful of users, and only when our schedules align.
Why not evaluate the merits of the suggestion made, rather than trying to insist that users like myself are the problem? We’re not the problem! A relatively small number of MUT users are the problem, and they effectively chase off the casuals because of how they play. The Git Gud Guys already have their “Pro League” component built into MUT with Ranked. It’s not like my proposal ruins your MUT experience if implemented. It just ensures you play people who play football the way you do.
I don’t think it would change much. Every single h2h game is the same. Same offensive schemes run, same defensive schemes run. Some guys are just better at it than others. For every 20 games I play, I may play 1 game where someone has a non-meta scheme. Gotta just learn how to abuse it. One you shut it down once or twice, most folks quit out.
I’m far from great at this game, h2h record is something like 120-25, but I don’t run meta. It’s possible to win against these losers, but man it’s frustrating.
Why can't people offer suggestions for a better overall experience without others jumping all over them telling them to just get better?
I agree that they could help make the game more accessible to a wider range of people by making adjustments to the matchmaking. Doesn't that benefit everyone? EA included?
My idea was to have separate leagues. One that offers high rewards and rankings, and is an anything goes league. The best players and the ones who like to manipulate the programming can battle it out.
Then another league that offers little to no rewards and is aimed at making the games more realistic with regards to: forcing punting on 4th and long (in qtrs 1-3), not calling the same play multiple times in a row, not flipping the entire line of scrimmage every time before a play, making QBs who roll out and run fumble more, deleting plays that are known insta-shed plays, etc. The average players who just want to play a realistic style game could focus on this league.
LilsGotSkillz said:Why can't people offer suggestions for a better overall experience without others jumping all over them telling them to just get better?
I agree that they could help make the game more accessible to a wider range of people by making adjustments to the matchmaking. Doesn't that benefit everyone? EA included?
My idea was to have separate leagues. One that offers high rewards and rankings, and is an anything goes league. The best players and the ones who like to manipulate the programming can battle it out.
Then another league that offers little to no rewards and is aimed at making the games more realistic with regards to: forcing punting on 4th and long (in qtrs 1-3), not calling the same play multiple times in a row, not flipping the entire line of scrimmage every time before a play, making QBs who roll out and run fumble more, deleting plays that are known insta-shed plays, etc. The average players who just want to play a realistic style game could focus on this league.
,,,,,offer suggestions for a better overall experience.....
....aimed at making the games more realistic..... ......forcing punting on 4th and long (in qtrs 1-3), not calling the same play multiple times in a row, not flipping the entire line of scrimmage every time before a play, making QBs who roll out and run fumble more, deleting plays that are known insta-shed plays.....
Forcing punts against the team wishes? Not realistic. Not allowed to pick any play you want? Not realistic. Forcing QBs to fumble on scrambles and roll outs? Not realistic. Deleting plays? Not realistic.
Exactly zero of these ideas "make the games more realistic" nor do they make a "better overall experience" for anyone except you. Because you have decided to play the game one way and think every other way is wrong or "manipulating the programming".
Is play action "unrealistic"? Are RPOs "unrealistic"? Is running Cover 3 from a 2 High look "unrealistic"? Each one of those things are purposely designed to "manipulate the programming" of the other team. Every NFL, college, high school, and peewee team in the country doesn't play "realistic" football according to GotLilSkillz.
droblunts313 said:I’m not even defending ea. ea is a trash company. But it’s the only football game we have and I enjoy it. Im not delusional like you and all your other friends on here that complain all the time. I’ve played this game for a long time, I know how ea is and I know what to expect. You are literally insane if you think it will change one random year. Look up the definition of insane.
I agree with the sentiment
I've been playing since I was my sons age of 8. Hes 11 now and even he understands some of why the game is how it is now. Just enjoy it the best you can because guess what..... it isn't changing even with all the negative posts. It's EA sports baby its in da game.
LionsMane said:I agree with the sentiment
I've been playing since I was my sons age of 8. Hes 11 now and even he understands some of why the game is how it is now. Just enjoy it the best you can because guess what..... it isn't changing even with all the negative posts. It's EA sports baby its in da game.
Exactly, we all know ea is a scumbag company but they’re all we have right now. The game is bad but it’s not so bad it’s unplayable. We just have to adapt and make the most of it. All these people complaining are just making everything worse. I don’t want to hear all the complaining all the time lol.
The complaining is unfortunately a societal problem
Everyone thinks its cool to jump on bandwagons and this is the new wagon
Grow up i say and make it better by being positive
Gooddcking said:,,,,,offer suggestions for a better overall experience.....
....aimed at making the games more realistic..... ......forcing punting on 4th and long (in qtrs 1-3), not calling the same play multiple times in a row, not flipping the entire line of scrimmage every time before a play, making QBs who roll out and run fumble more, deleting plays that are known insta-shed plays.....
Forcing punts against the team wishes? Not realistic. Not allowed to pick any play you want? Not realistic. Forcing QBs to fumble on scrambles and roll outs? Not realistic. Deleting plays? Not realistic.
Exactly zero of these ideas "make the games more realistic" nor do they make a "better overall experience" for anyone except you. Because you have decided to play the game one way and think every other way is wrong or "manipulating the programming".
Is play action "unrealistic"? Are RPOs "unrealistic"? Is running Cover 3 from a 2 High look "unrealistic"? Each one of those things are purposely designed to "manipulate the programming" of the other team. Every NFL, college, high school, and peewee team in the country doesn't play "realistic" football according to GotLilSkillz.
Typical…you attack me and say I “have decided to play the game one way and think every other way is wrong” when I specifically said there should be TWO SEPARATE leagues that allow people to play different ways.
You are actually the one who is arguing that the gameplay needs to stay exactly the same way it is (the way you like it) and anything different is wrong.
Your other points and straw man arguments are nonsensical and not worth refuting . And you are disingenuous to act like there isn’t a big part of the community taking advantage vulnerabilities in the programming .
And to you other guys who spend time reading these posts then complain about people complaining….this is just how forums are. Just enjoy it or learn to get better at not getting annoyed by people complaining. Sound familiar?
On a serious note, there is a difference between just complaining and people offering ideas to make the experience better. You can agree with those ideas or not. That’s what a forum is for.
Why are some of you so resistant to new ideas?
droblunts313 said:I’m not telling you to get better, I’m telling you to play the hand you are dealt. Complaining will do absolutely nothing. People have been complaining for almost 10 years not about MUT and nothing has changed. You are insane if you think it will change because you voice your opinion. I’m sorry man, ea is trash but it’s all we have right now.
That's a very american answer. Just duck down and take it.
To say it in the words of Cassian Andor. "Do I look thankful to you?"
phatalerror said:Since the top-ranking users don't actually use football tactics and just spam a narrow selection of plays, EA should just...
1) Log what plays are called by users
2) Match winning users against winning users that call similar plays
3) Match losing users against users that actually call a variety of plays, because they're losing tooAll the eBook RPO spammers can bang each other over the head, and the rest of us can play football.
Problem solved.
Preach!